matous-volf/todo-baggins
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 26 Pull Requests Actions Projects 1 Activity

feat: list sorting #42

Merged
matous-volf merged 9 commits from feat/list-sorting into main 2024-09-09 17:09:22 +00:00
Conversation 3 Commits 9 Files Changed 16 +277 -116
matous-volf commented 2024-09-09 16:53:08 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the BottomPanel component for improved visual layout.
    • Introduced the TaskListItem component for better task rendering.
    • Implemented sorting for tasks and subtasks across various components.
    • Added functionality to update task timestamps when subtasks are modified.

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in task and subtask management functions.

  • Documentation

    • Added new modules to improve code organization and maintainability.

  • Chores

    • Refactored existing components to enhance readability and maintainability.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced the `BottomPanel` component for improved visual layout. - Introduced the `TaskListItem` component for better task rendering. - Implemented sorting for tasks and subtasks across various components. - Added functionality to update task timestamps when subtasks are modified. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved error handling in task and subtask management functions. - **Documentation** - Added new modules to improve code organization and maintainability. - **Chores** - Refactored existing components to enhance readability and maintainability. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-09-09 16:54:20 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several enhancements across multiple components of the codebase, including modifications to the rendering logic of UI elements, the addition of new modules, and improvements in error handling. Key changes involve the implementation of sorting mechanisms for tasks and subtasks, the introduction of a new TaskListItem component for better task representation, and the enhancement of error management capabilities related to subtasks. Additionally, the Project and Subtask structs are updated to support comparison traits, facilitating better organization and usability.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/components/bottom_panel.rs Height logic modified from 448px to 506px for the BottomPanel component.
src/components/mod.rs Added new task_list_item module to enhance modularity.
src/components/pages/category_today_page.rs, src/components/pages/projects_page.rs, src/components/subtasks_form.rs, src/components/task_list.rs Introduced sorting logic for tasks and subtasks before rendering, improving organization. Replaced inline task rendering with TaskListItem component for modularity.
src/components/task_list_item.rs New file defining TaskListItem component for rendering individual tasks.
src/errors/subtask_error.rs Added From trait implementation for converting ErrorVec<Error> to ErrorVec<SubtaskError>.
src/main.rs Added new utils module for utility functions.
src/models/project.rs, src/models/subtask.rs, src/models/task.rs Implemented Eq, PartialOrd, and Ord traits for comparison and sorting capabilities.
src/server/subtasks.rs, src/server/tasks.rs Enhanced subtask management with new trigger_task_updated_at function to update task timestamps; streamlined error handling.
src/utils/mod.rs, src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs Introduced reverse_ord_option module for reverse ordering of Option types.

Possibly related PRs

  • #40: Enhancements in subtask management relate to the modifications in the main PR that involve UI elements interacting with subtasks.
  • #41: Focuses on incorporating a count of subtasks in task lists, relevant to the changes in the BottomPanel component for displaying task-related information.

Tip

New features

Walkthrough comment now includes:

  • Possibly related PRs: A list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context.
  • Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.

Notes:

  • Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- walkthrough_start --> ## Walkthrough This pull request introduces several enhancements across multiple components of the codebase, including modifications to the rendering logic of UI elements, the addition of new modules, and improvements in error handling. Key changes involve the implementation of sorting mechanisms for tasks and subtasks, the introduction of a new `TaskListItem` component for better task representation, and the enhancement of error management capabilities related to subtasks. Additionally, the `Project` and `Subtask` structs are updated to support comparison traits, facilitating better organization and usability. ## Changes | File(s) | Change Summary | |---------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | `src/components/bottom_panel.rs` | Height logic modified from `448px` to `506px` for the `BottomPanel` component. | | `src/components/mod.rs` | Added new `task_list_item` module to enhance modularity. | | `src/components/pages/category_today_page.rs`, `src/components/pages/projects_page.rs`, `src/components/subtasks_form.rs`, `src/components/task_list.rs` | Introduced sorting logic for tasks and subtasks before rendering, improving organization. Replaced inline task rendering with `TaskListItem` component for modularity. | | `src/components/task_list_item.rs` | New file defining `TaskListItem` component for rendering individual tasks. | | `src/errors/subtask_error.rs` | Added `From` trait implementation for converting `ErrorVec<Error>` to `ErrorVec<SubtaskError>`. | | `src/main.rs` | Added new `utils` module for utility functions. | | `src/models/project.rs`, `src/models/subtask.rs`, `src/models/task.rs` | Implemented `Eq`, `PartialOrd`, and `Ord` traits for comparison and sorting capabilities. | | `src/server/subtasks.rs`, `src/server/tasks.rs` | Enhanced subtask management with new `trigger_task_updated_at` function to update task timestamps; streamlined error handling. | | `src/utils/mod.rs`, `src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs` | Introduced `reverse_ord_option` module for reverse ordering of `Option` types. | ## Possibly related PRs - **#40**: Enhancements in subtask management relate to the modifications in the main PR that involve UI elements interacting with subtasks. - **#41**: Focuses on incorporating a count of subtasks in task lists, relevant to the changes in the `BottomPanel` component for displaying task-related information. <!-- walkthrough_end --><!-- This is an auto-generated comment: raw summary by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- ```markdown src/components/bottom_panel.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The diff reflects a modification in the `BottomPanel` function's logic within the `src/components/bottom_panel.rs` file. Specifically, the change occurs in the height determination logic based on the state of the `expanded` variable and the current route. The original height for the case `(true, _, _)` was set to `448px`, which has been increased to `506px`. This adjustment alters the visual layout of the `BottomPanel` component, potentially affecting how it interacts with other UI elements or how it is displayed on the screen. The change suggests a design decision to provide more space when the panel is in an expanded state, which could enhance user experience by accommodating additional content or improving accessibility. Overall, this modification impacts the control flow related to UI rendering, specifically in how the height of the panel is calculated based on its state. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Modified: `pub(crate) fn BottomPanel(display_form: Signal<bool>) -> Element` in `src/components/bottom_panel.rs` (height logic changed from `h-[448px]` to `h-[506px]`) --- src/components/mod.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces a new module declaration within the `src/components/mod.rs` file. Specifically, it adds the `task_list_item` module to the existing set of modules that are publicly accessible within the crate. This change enhances the modular structure of the codebase by allowing for the encapsulation of functionality related to task list items, which may include components, logic, or data structures pertinent to managing or displaying task lists. The addition signifies an expansion of the component library, potentially facilitating better organization and maintainability of the code. The overall control flow and logic of the existing modules remain unchanged, as the diff does not modify any existing functionality but rather extends the capabilities of the module system by introducing a new entity. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `pub(crate) mod task_list_item;` in `src/components/mod.rs` --- src/components/pages/category_today_page.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces several modifications to the `CategoryTodayPage` component in the `src/components/pages/category_today_page.rs` file. The primary change involves the restructuring of how tasks are displayed within the component, particularly in the handling of long-term tasks. Initially, the rendering of long-term tasks was done using a series of nested `div` elements, which included hardcoded class names and inline logic for displaying task details. The new implementation simplifies this by utilizing the `TaskListItem` component, which encapsulates the rendering logic for individual tasks. This change enhances code readability and maintainability by separating concerns, allowing `TaskListItem` to handle the display of task properties such as title and deadline. Additionally, the logic for sorting tasks has been introduced. When tasks are in a loading state, they are cloned and sorted before being rendered. This ensures that the tasks are presented in a consistent order, improving the user experience by providing a predictable layout. The previous implementation did not include any sorting mechanism, which could lead to a disorganized display of tasks. The overall control flow remains intact, but the rendering logic is now more modular and efficient. The use of the `TaskListItem` component allows for easier updates and modifications in the future, as any changes to task rendering can be made within that component without affecting the `CategoryTodayPage` directly. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `pub(crate) fn CategoryTodayPage() -> Element` in `src/components/pages/category_today_page.rs` - Added: `TaskListItem` component usage in `src/components/pages/category_today_page.rs` (no signature change, but new entity introduced for task rendering) --- src/components/pages/projects_page.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The diff introduces a modification to the `ProjectsPage` function in the `src/components/pages/projects_page.rs` file, specifically altering how the projects are handled when the query result is in a loading state. Previously, the projects were directly rendered without any sorting, but the new implementation includes a sorting step before rendering. This change enhances the user experience by ensuring that the projects are displayed in a consistent order, which can be particularly useful for users navigating through potentially large lists of projects. The logic flow has been adjusted to first clone the `projects` collection and then sort it using the `sort()` method. This sorting operation is performed within the `QueryResult::Loading(Some(QueryValue::Projects(projects)))` match arm. The subsequent rendering of the projects remains largely unchanged, but now occurs after the sorting step, ensuring that the projects are presented in a sorted manner. This change not only improves the visual organization of the projects but also maintains the existing functionality of allowing users to click on a project to edit it, as the onclick handler remains intact. Overall, the primary semantic difference lies in the addition of the sorting logic, which modifies the control flow to ensure that the projects are displayed in a sorted order during the loading state, thereby enhancing the usability of the `ProjectsPage`. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Modified: `pub(crate) fn ProjectsPage() -> Element` in `src/components/pages/projects_page.rs` (no signature change, but functionality altered to include sorting of projects) --- src/components/subtasks_form.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The changes made to the `SubtasksForm` function in `src/components/subtasks_form.rs` primarily enhance the handling of the `subtasks` data structure. The most significant modification is the introduction of a sorting mechanism for the `subtasks` before they are rendered. Initially, the function directly iterated over the `subtasks` without any specific order. The new implementation first clones the `subtasks` and sorts them, ensuring that the rendered output is in a consistent order. This change improves the user interface by providing a predictable arrangement of subtasks, which can enhance usability and readability. The control flow remains largely the same, but the addition of the sorting step introduces a new state where the subtasks are organized before they are processed for rendering. This adjustment does not alter the fundamental logic of how subtasks are displayed but rather optimizes the presentation layer by ensuring that the subtasks are displayed in a sorted manner. The use of `subtasks.clone()` in the sorting operation indicates that the original data structure remains unchanged, preserving immutability while allowing for a sorted view during rendering. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Modified: `pub(crate) fn SubtasksForm(task: Task) -> Element` in `src/components/subtasks_form.rs` - No change in the function signature, but the internal logic has been updated to include sorting of subtasks. --- src/components/task_list.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces several modifications to the `TaskList` function within the `src/components/task_list.rs` file, primarily enhancing the rendering of task items. The most significant change is the introduction of the `TaskListItem` component, which replaces a previously defined inline structure for displaying individual tasks. This refactor streamlines the code by encapsulating the task rendering logic within the `TaskListItem` component, promoting better separation of concerns and reusability. Additionally, the tasks are now sorted before being rendered, which ensures that the task list is displayed in a consistent order. This sorting operation is performed using the `sort()` method on the `tasks` vector, indicating a shift in how tasks are presented to the user. The removal of the inline rendering logic for task details, such as the title, deadline, and subtasks, suggests a move towards a more modular architecture, where each task's presentation is handled by its dedicated component. Overall, these changes enhance the maintainability of the code by reducing complexity within the `TaskList` function and improving the clarity of the task rendering process. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `use crate::components::task_list_item::TaskListItem;` in `src/components/task_list.rs` - Modified: `pub(crate) fn TaskList(tasks: Vec<TaskWithSubtasks>, class: Option<&'static str>)` remains unchanged in signature but now utilizes `TaskListItem` for rendering tasks instead of inline JSX. --- src/components/task_list_item.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The newly introduced file `src/components/task_list_item.rs` defines a Dioxus component named `TaskListItem`, which is responsible for rendering a task item within a user interface. This component takes a `TaskWithSubtasks` object as a parameter, encapsulating both the task details and its associated subtasks. The component's layout is structured using a combination of HTML-like syntax provided by Dioxus, allowing for a responsive and visually organized presentation. The main functionality of the `TaskListItem` component includes displaying the task title prominently, along with additional contextual information such as deadlines, calendar times, and the status of subtasks. The control flow within the component utilizes conditional rendering to check for the presence of deadlines and subtasks. If a deadline exists, it formats and displays the date, adjusting the format based on whether the deadline falls within the current year. Similarly, if the task's category is a calendar type, it extracts and displays the associated time. The subtasks are represented by a count of completed versus total subtasks, providing users with a quick overview of the task's progress. Icons are included next to each piece of information for enhanced visual clarity, utilizing Font Awesome classes for consistent styling. Overall, the `TaskListItem` component enhances the user experience by providing a clear and informative representation of tasks and their subtasks, facilitating better task management. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `pub(crate) fn TaskListItem(task: TaskWithSubtasks) -> Element` in `src/components/task_list_item.rs` --- src/errors/subtask_error.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces a new implementation of the `From` trait for converting an `ErrorVec<Error>` into an `ErrorVec<SubtaskError>`. This change enhances the error handling capabilities of the `SubtaskError` type by allowing it to be constructed directly from a vector of generic errors. The new implementation defines a method that takes an `ErrorVec<Error>`, converts it into a standard vector, and then maps each error to a `SubtaskError` using the `SubtaskError::Error` constructor. The resulting vector is then collected back into an `ErrorVec<SubtaskError>`. This addition improves the flexibility of error handling in the context of subtasks, enabling more seamless integration with existing error types and enhancing the overall robustness of the error management system. The control flow is modified to include this new conversion logic, which allows for a more streamlined approach to error handling when dealing with collections of errors. This change does not affect existing functionalities but rather extends the capabilities of the `SubtaskError` type, making it easier to work with multiple errors in a consistent manner. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `impl From<ErrorVec<Error>> for ErrorVec<SubtaskError>` in `src/errors/subtask_error.rs` --- src/main.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces a new module named `utils` in the `src/main.rs` file. This addition signifies an expansion of the module structure within the application, potentially indicating a refactoring or enhancement of functionality related to utility functions or shared logic. The inclusion of the `utils` module suggests that the codebase is being organized to improve modularity and maintainability, allowing for better separation of concerns. However, the diff does not provide any specific changes to the existing logic or control flow within the application, as it solely focuses on the addition of the module without altering any existing functions, structures, or control paths. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `mod utils;` in `src/main.rs` --- src/models/project.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces enhancements to the `Project` struct in the `src/models/project.rs` file by implementing additional traits that facilitate comparison operations. Specifically, the `Eq`, `PartialOrd`, and `Ord` traits are now implemented for the `Project` struct, allowing instances of `Project` to be compared based on their titles. The `Eq` trait implementation signifies that two `Project` instances can be considered equal if they are identical in terms of their data. The `PartialOrd` trait provides a method for partial comparison, enabling the use of the `cmp` method to establish a total ordering. The `Ord` trait further defines a complete ordering by implementing the `cmp` method, which compares two `Project` instances based on the lexicographical order of their titles. This change enhances the functionality of the `Project` struct, allowing it to be used in contexts where ordering and equality checks are necessary, such as sorting or storing in collections that require ordering. Overall, these modifications improve the usability of the `Project` struct in Rust's type system, enabling more robust data handling and manipulation capabilities. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `impl Eq for Project` in `src/models/project.rs` - Added: `impl PartialOrd<Self> for Project` in `src/models/project.rs` - Added: `fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Option<Ordering>` in `impl PartialOrd<Self> for Project` in `src/models/project.rs` - Added: `impl Ord for Project` in `src/models/project.rs` - Added: `fn cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Ordering` in `impl Ord for Project` in `src/models/project.rs` --- src/models/subtask.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces significant enhancements to the `Subtask` struct in the `src/models/subtask.rs` file by implementing comparison traits that facilitate ordering and equality checks. Specifically, the `Eq`, `PartialOrd`, and `Ord` traits are now implemented for the `Subtask` struct, which allows instances of `Subtask` to be compared based on their completion status and creation timestamps. The `Eq` trait implementation signifies that two `Subtask` instances can be checked for equality, which is essential for collections that rely on equality checks. The `PartialOrd` trait provides a method for partial comparison, enabling the use of the `cmp` method to establish a total ordering. This is particularly useful when sorting or organizing collections of `Subtask` instances. The `Ord` trait implementation defines the logic for comparing two `Subtask` instances. The comparison first evaluates whether the subtasks are completed, using the `is_completed()` method. If both subtasks share the same completion status, the comparison then falls back to their creation timestamps, utilizing the `created_at()` method. This dual-layered comparison logic ensures that subtasks are ordered first by their completion state and then chronologically, enhancing the overall functionality and usability of the `Subtask` struct in contexts where ordering is necessary. Overall, these changes improve the struct's capabilities in terms of sorting and equality, making it more versatile for use in collections and algorithms that require these operations. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `impl Eq for Subtask` in `src/models/subtask.rs` - Added: `impl PartialOrd<Self> for Subtask` in `src/models/subtask.rs` - Added: `impl Ord for Subtask` in `src/models/subtask.rs` --- src/models/task.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces significant enhancements to the `Task` and `TaskWithSubtasks` structs in the `src/models/task.rs` file, primarily focusing on implementing comparison traits to facilitate ordering. The changes include the addition of the `Eq`, `PartialOrd`, and `Ord` traits for both `Task` and `TaskWithSubtasks`, which allows instances of these structs to be compared and sorted based on specific criteria. For the `Task` struct, the `Ord` implementation defines a custom comparison logic that prioritizes the category of the task. When both tasks belong to the `Inbox` category, they are compared based on their creation timestamps. For tasks categorized under `Calendar`, the comparison first evaluates the date, followed by the time, and then the deadline, ensuring that tasks are ordered chronologically. For tasks marked as `Done` or `Trash`, the comparison is based on the last updated timestamp, with the most recently updated task appearing first. If the tasks belong to different categories, the comparison defaults to the deadline and creation timestamp. Similarly, the `TaskWithSubtasks` struct gains the same comparison traits, allowing it to be ordered based on the underlying `Task` it encapsulates. This ensures that collections of `TaskWithSubtasks` can be sorted in a manner consistent with the ordering rules established for `Task`. Overall, these changes enhance the functionality of the `Task` and `TaskWithSubtasks` structs by enabling sorting capabilities, which can be particularly useful for displaying tasks in a user interface or processing them in a specific order. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `impl Eq for Task` in `src/models/task.rs` - Added: `impl PartialOrd<Self> for Task` in `src/models/task.rs` - Added: `impl Ord for Task` in `src/models/task.rs` - Added: `impl Eq for TaskWithSubtasks` in `src/models/task.rs` - Added: `impl PartialOrd<Self> for TaskWithSubtasks` in `src/models/task.rs` - Added: `impl Ord for TaskWithSubtasks` in `src/models/task.rs` --- src/server/subtasks.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces several modifications to the `src/server/subtasks.rs` file, primarily enhancing the functionality of subtask management by integrating a new asynchronous function call, `trigger_task_updated_at`, which updates the timestamp of the associated task whenever a subtask is created, edited, or deleted. This change signifies a shift in the control flow of the `create_subtask`, `edit_subtask`, and `delete_subtask` functions, ensuring that the task's last updated timestamp is refreshed in response to changes in its subtasks. In the `create_subtask` function, after successfully creating a new subtask, the code now invokes `trigger_task_updated_at(new_subtask.task_id).await`, which awaits the completion of the task update operation and handles any potential errors by mapping them to an `ErrorVec<SubtaskError>`. This addition ensures that the task's last updated timestamp is accurately maintained whenever a new subtask is added. Similarly, the `edit_subtask` function has been updated to include the same call to `trigger_task_updated_at`, ensuring that any edits to a subtask also result in the task's timestamp being refreshed. This reinforces the relationship between subtasks and their parent tasks, maintaining data integrity regarding the last modification time. In the `delete_subtask` function, the logic has been adjusted to first retrieve the deleted subtask's details (specifically its task ID) before calling `trigger_task_updated_at(deleted_subtask.task_id()).await`. This ensures that the task's timestamp is updated correctly even when a subtask is removed, thereby maintaining consistency in the task's state. Additionally, minor adjustments were made to error handling across various functions, specifically in the `get_subtasks_of_task` and `restore_subtasks_of_task` functions, where the error mapping now consistently uses `ErrorVec<Error>` instead of `ErrorVec<SubtaskError>`. This change simplifies the error handling mechanism, making it more uniform across the file. Overall, the changes enhance the functionality of the subtask management system by ensuring that task timestamps are accurately updated in response to subtask modifications, thereby improving the integrity and usability of the task management features. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `async fn trigger_task_updated_at(task_id: i32)` in `src/server/tasks.rs` (assumed based on usage in the diff). - Modified: `pub(crate) async fn create_subtask(new_subtask: NewSubtask)` in `src/server/subtasks.rs` to include a call to `trigger_task_updated_at(new_subtask.task_id).await`. - Modified: `pub(crate) async fn edit_subtask(subtask_id: i32, new_subtask: NewSubtask)` in `src/server/subtasks.rs` to include a call to `trigger_task_updated_at(new_subtask.task_id).await`. - Modified: `pub(crate) async fn delete_subtask(subtask_id: i32)` in `src/server/subtasks.rs` to include a call to `trigger_task_updated_at(deleted_subtask.task_id()).await`. --- src/server/tasks.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces several modifications to the functionality of the Rust code in `src/server/tasks.rs`. Notably, it enhances the handling of task subtasks and introduces a new function for updating the timestamp of tasks. One significant change is the alteration in the `complete_task` function, where the error handling for restoring subtasks has been simplified. Previously, the function explicitly mapped errors to a vector of `Error::ServerInternal`, but this has been streamlined to use the `?` operator, which propagates errors directly. This change improves the readability and maintainability of the code by reducing boilerplate error handling. Additionally, a new public asynchronous function, `trigger_task_updated_at`, has been added. This function is responsible for updating the `updated_at` timestamp of a task identified by `task_id`. It establishes a database connection, performs an update operation on the `tasks` schema, and returns the updated task. The use of `Local::now().naive_local()` ensures that the timestamp is captured in the local timezone, which is crucial for applications that rely on accurate time tracking. The function also includes error handling that converts any database errors into a vector of `Error` types, maintaining consistency with the error handling strategy used throughout the module. Overall, these changes enhance the functionality related to task management, particularly in terms of error handling and the ability to update task timestamps effectively. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `pub(crate) async fn trigger_task_updated_at(task_id: i32) -> Result<Task, ErrorVec<Error>>` in `src/server/tasks.rs` - Modified: `pub(crate) async fn complete_task(task_id: i32) -> Result<Task, ServerFnError<Error>>` in `src/server/tasks.rs` (error handling streamlined) --- src/utils/mod.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The newly introduced file `reverse_ord_option.rs` within the `src/utils` directory adds a module that likely implements functionality related to ordering options in a reverse manner. This module is designed to enhance the utility of option types by providing a mechanism to compare and sort them based on a reverse order criterion. The control flow within this module may involve defining traits or functions that facilitate the comparison of wrapped values, allowing users to easily manipulate collections of options where the highest value is prioritized over the lowest. This could be particularly useful in scenarios where reverse sorting is required, such as in priority queues or when implementing custom sorting algorithms. The encapsulation of this logic within a dedicated module promotes modularity and reusability across the codebase, enabling developers to leverage this functionality without duplicating code. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `pub(crate) mod reverse_ord_option;` in `src/utils/mod.rs` --- src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The newly introduced file `reverse_ord_option.rs` defines a struct called `ReverseOrdOption`, which is designed to alter the default ordering behavior of Rust's `Option` type. By default, `None` is considered less than `Some`, but this struct reverses that logic. The `ReverseOrdOption` struct wraps a reference to an `Option<T>` and implements several traits to facilitate this new ordering. The struct derives the `PartialEq` trait, allowing for equality comparisons between instances of `ReverseOrdOption`. It also implements the `Eq` trait, which is necessary for types that can be compared for equality. The core functionality is provided through the implementation of the `PartialOrd` and `Ord` traits. The `partial_cmp` method is defined to return an `Option<Ordering>`, which encapsulates the comparison logic. It calls the `cmp` method, which is implemented to handle various cases of `Option` values. In the `cmp` method, the logic checks the states of the two `Option` references being compared. If both are `None`, they are considered equal. If one is `None` and the other is `Some`, the `None` is treated as greater, effectively reversing the default behavior. If both are `Some`, the method compares their inner values using the standard ordering defined for the type `T`. Additionally, the struct provides a conversion implementation from a reference to an `Option<T>` to a `ReverseOrdOption<'a, T>`, allowing for seamless integration and usage of this new ordering mechanism in contexts where `Option` values are typically used. Overall, this file introduces a new way to handle ordering for `Option` types in Rust, providing developers with a tool to reverse the default comparison logic, which can be particularly useful in sorting and prioritization scenarios. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `pub(crate) struct ReverseOrdOption<'a, T>(&'a Option<T>)` in `src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs` - Added: `impl<'a, T: Ord> Eq for ReverseOrdOption<'a, T>` in `src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs` - Added: `impl<'a, T: Ord> PartialOrd<Self> for ReverseOrdOption<'a, T>` in `src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs` - Added: `impl<'a, T: Ord> Ord for ReverseOrdOption<'a, T>` in `src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs` - Added: `impl<'a, T> From<&'a Option<T>> for ReverseOrdOption<'a, T>` in `src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs` ``` --> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: raw summary by coderabbit.ai --><!-- This is an auto-generated comment: pr objectives by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- Title: feat: list sorting Number: 42 User: matous-volf --> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: pr objectives by coderabbit.ai --><!-- announcements_start --> > [!TIP] > <details> > <summary>New features</summary> > > Walkthrough comment now includes: > > - Possibly related PRs: A list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context. > - Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file. > > Notes: > > - Please share any feedback in the [discussion post](https://discordapp.com/channels/1134356397673414807/1282535539299323995) on our Discord. > - Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default). > > </details> <!-- announcements_end --><!-- commit_ids_reviewed_start --> <!-- 63e2b20d969e6b9fc6821d391c80c69cc05537be --> <!-- commit_ids_reviewed_end --><!-- tips_start --> --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details> <!-- tips_end -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) requested changes 2024-09-09 17:01:01 +00:00
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment
Copy Link

Actionable comments posted: 12

Outside diff range comments (2)
src/server/subtasks.rs (1)

Potential Issue with Error Handling in create_subtask

The error handling in the create_subtask function may be inconsistent due to the absence of a conversion implementation between ErrorVec<Error> and ErrorVec<SubtaskError>. This could lead to runtime errors or incorrect error handling. Consider implementing the necessary conversion or adjusting the error handling logic to ensure consistency and correctness.

  • Verify the error handling logic in create_subtask and ensure proper conversion between error types.
Analysis chain

Line range hint 9-31: Approve integration of timestamp updates, suggest verifying error handling.

The addition of trigger_task_updated_at after creating a subtask is a good practice for maintaining data integrity. The error handling for this function appears to be correctly implemented, mapping errors from the asynchronous call to ErrorVec<SubtaskError>.

However, ensure that the error types throughout the system are consistent and correctly mapped, especially when integrating new asynchronous calls.

Run the following script to verify the error handling consistency:

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify error handling consistency for `trigger_task_updated_at`.

# Test: Search for error handling patterns. Expect: Consistent error mapping.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'trigger_task_updated_at'

Length of output: 1617

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if there is a conversion between `ErrorVec<Error>` and `ErrorVec<SubtaskError>`.

# Test: Search for `From` or `Into` trait implementations for error conversion.
rg --type rust 'impl (From|Into)<ErrorVec<SubtaskError>> for ErrorVec<Error>'

Length of output: 79

src/components/pages/category_today_page.rs (1)

Line range hint 14-33: Approved changes with a suggestion.

The restructuring to use TaskListItem enhances modularity and maintainability. The sorting logic added to the tasks ensures a consistent user experience.

However, there's a TODO comment for adding a loading indicator which should be addressed to improve user feedback during data loading.

Would you like me to help implement the loading indicator or should we track this as a separate task?

Also applies to: 58-59

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 72adfc7285 and 63e2b20d96.

Files selected for processing (16)
  • src/components/bottom_panel.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/components/mod.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/components/pages/category_today_page.rs (2 hunks)
  • src/components/pages/projects_page.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/components/subtasks_form.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/components/task_list.rs (3 hunks)
  • src/components/task_list_item.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/errors/subtask_error.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/main.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/models/project.rs (2 hunks)
  • src/models/subtask.rs (2 hunks)
  • src/models/task.rs (3 hunks)
  • src/server/subtasks.rs (5 hunks)
  • src/server/tasks.rs (4 hunks)
  • src/utils/mod.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (19)
src/components/mod.rs (1)

16-16: Approve the addition of the task_list_item module.

The addition of pub(crate) mod task_list_item; is a good practice for expanding the component library and encapsulating task list item functionality. Ensure that this module is properly integrated with other components and that its functionality is covered by unit tests.

src/main.rs (1)

8-8: Approve the addition of the utils module.

The addition of mod utils; is a positive step towards improving the modularity and maintainability of the application. Ensure that the new module is properly integrated and does not introduce any side effects or dependencies that could disrupt the existing application flow.

Verification successful

Integration of utils module is verified and correct.

The ReverseOrdOption struct is properly defined in src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs and is used in src/models/task.rs, confirming its integration. There are no unresolved dependencies or side effects introduced by the utils module. The addition of the utils module is a positive step towards improving modularity and maintainability.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify integration of `utils` module with the application.

# Test: Search for usage of `utils` in the application files. Expect: Proper integration.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'utils'

Length of output: 515

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition of `reverse_ord_option` within the `utils` module.
ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'mod reverse_ord_option { $$$ }'

# Check for any potential side effects or dependencies introduced by the `utils` module by searching for its usage across the codebase.
rg --type rust 'utils::'

Length of output: 165

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition of `ReverseOrdOption` across the entire codebase.
rg --type rust 'ReverseOrdOption'

Length of output: 1083

src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs (5)

3-7: Well-documented and correctly implemented struct.

The ReverseOrdOption struct is well-documented with clear comments explaining its purpose. The use of a lifetime parameter is appropriate for the context.

8-8: Correct implementation of Eq trait.

The Eq trait is correctly implemented, leveraging the derived PartialEq for equality checks.

10-14: Consistent and correct implementation of PartialOrd.

The implementation of PartialOrd correctly delegates to the Ord trait, ensuring consistent ordering logic.

16-25: Custom logic in Ord implementation is correct and well-implemented.

The Ord trait implementation provides the necessary logic to reverse the default ordering of Options, handling all cases correctly.

27-31: Useful and straightforward From implementation.

The implementation of the From trait for ReverseOrdOption is straightforward and enhances usability by allowing easy conversions from &Option<T>.

src/models/project.rs (3)

39-39: Appropriate implementation of Eq trait.

The Eq trait is correctly implemented for Project, leveraging the derived PartialEq.

41-45: Consistent and correct implementation of PartialOrd.

The PartialOrd trait for Project correctly uses the cmp method from the Ord trait, ensuring consistent ordering logic.

47-51: Logical and effective Ord implementation.

The Ord trait implementation for Project is logical, using the title field for comparison, which supports the sorting functionality required by the PR objectives.

src/components/pages/projects_page.rs (1)

15-32: Well-implemented sorting logic enhances user experience.

The addition of sorting logic in the ProjectsPage component is well-implemented. Cloning the projects collection before sorting ensures that the original data is not modified, which is a good practice. Sorting the projects before rendering provides a consistent user experience.

src/models/subtask.rs (2)

52-52: Approved: Eq trait implementation for Subtask.

The implementation is straightforward and correct as it leverages the derived PartialEq.

54-58: Approved: PartialOrd trait implementation for Subtask.

The implementation correctly delegates to the Ord trait's cmp method, ensuring consistent behavior between PartialOrd and Ord.

src/components/bottom_panel.rs (1)

44-44: Height adjustment in expanded state approved, verify UI impact.

The change from 448px to 506px in the expanded state of the BottomPanel is approved as it likely enhances user experience by providing more space. However, it's crucial to verify that this adjustment does not negatively impact the layout or interaction with other UI components.

Run the following script to verify the UI impact:

src/models/task.rs (1)

111-123: Delegated comparison logic approved.

The implementation of comparison traits (Eq, PartialOrd, Ord) for TaskWithSubtasks is approved. Delegating the comparison to the Task ensures consistency and efficiency in sorting TaskWithSubtasks based on the encapsulated Task.

src/server/subtasks.rs (2)

42-48: Approve error handling adjustments.

The adjustments to error handling in get_subtasks_of_task improve consistency across the system by using ErrorVec<Error>. This change simplifies the error handling mechanism, making it more uniform and easier to maintain.

85-97: Approve error handling adjustments.

The adjustments to error handling in restore_subtasks_of_task improve consistency across the system by using ErrorVec<Error>. This change simplifies the error handling mechanism, making it more uniform and easier to maintain.

src/components/pages/category_today_page.rs (1)

9-9: Approved import addition.

The addition of TaskListItem is necessary for the new component usage.

src/server/tasks.rs (1)

163-163: Approved streamlined error handling.

The use of the ? operator in complete_task simplifies error handling and improves code readability.

**Actionable comments posted: 12** <details> <summary>Outside diff range comments (2)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/server/subtasks.rs (1)</summary><blockquote> **Potential Issue with Error Handling in `create_subtask`** The error handling in the `create_subtask` function may be inconsistent due to the absence of a conversion implementation between `ErrorVec<Error>` and `ErrorVec<SubtaskError>`. This could lead to runtime errors or incorrect error handling. Consider implementing the necessary conversion or adjusting the error handling logic to ensure consistency and correctness. - Verify the error handling logic in `create_subtask` and ensure proper conversion between error types. <details> <summary>Analysis chain</summary> Line range hint `9-31`: **Approve integration of timestamp updates, suggest verifying error handling.** The addition of `trigger_task_updated_at` after creating a subtask is a good practice for maintaining data integrity. The error handling for this function appears to be correctly implemented, mapping errors from the asynchronous call to `ErrorVec<SubtaskError>`. However, ensure that the error types throughout the system are consistent and correctly mapped, especially when integrating new asynchronous calls. Run the following script to verify the error handling consistency: </details> <details> <summary>Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling consistency for `trigger_task_updated_at`. # Test: Search for error handling patterns. Expect: Consistent error mapping. rg --type rust -A 5 $'trigger_task_updated_at' ``` Length of output: 1617 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if there is a conversion between `ErrorVec<Error>` and `ErrorVec<SubtaskError>`. # Test: Search for `From` or `Into` trait implementations for error conversion. rg --type rust 'impl (From|Into)<ErrorVec<SubtaskError>> for ErrorVec<Error>' ``` Length of output: 79 </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/components/pages/category_today_page.rs (1)</summary><blockquote> Line range hint `14-33`: **Approved changes with a suggestion.** The restructuring to use `TaskListItem` enhances modularity and maintainability. The sorting logic added to the tasks ensures a consistent user experience. However, there's a TODO comment for adding a loading indicator which should be addressed to improve user feedback during data loading. Would you like me to help implement the loading indicator or should we track this as a separate task? Also applies to: 58-59 </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>Review details</summary> **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: ASSERTIVE** <details> <summary>Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 72adfc728583a1f8c02e663a5d5489a198772f5b and 63e2b20d969e6b9fc6821d391c80c69cc05537be. </details> <details> <summary>Files selected for processing (16)</summary> * src/components/bottom_panel.rs (1 hunks) * src/components/mod.rs (1 hunks) * src/components/pages/category_today_page.rs (2 hunks) * src/components/pages/projects_page.rs (1 hunks) * src/components/subtasks_form.rs (1 hunks) * src/components/task_list.rs (3 hunks) * src/components/task_list_item.rs (1 hunks) * src/errors/subtask_error.rs (1 hunks) * src/main.rs (1 hunks) * src/models/project.rs (2 hunks) * src/models/subtask.rs (2 hunks) * src/models/task.rs (3 hunks) * src/server/subtasks.rs (5 hunks) * src/server/tasks.rs (4 hunks) * src/utils/mod.rs (1 hunks) * src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>Additional comments not posted (19)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/components/mod.rs (1)</summary><blockquote> `16-16`: **Approve the addition of the `task_list_item` module.** The addition of `pub(crate) mod task_list_item;` is a good practice for expanding the component library and encapsulating task list item functionality. Ensure that this module is properly integrated with other components and that its functionality is covered by unit tests. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/main.rs (1)</summary><blockquote> `8-8`: **Approve the addition of the `utils` module.** The addition of `mod utils;` is a positive step towards improving the modularity and maintainability of the application. Ensure that the new module is properly integrated and does not introduce any side effects or dependencies that could disrupt the existing application flow. <details> <summary>Verification successful</summary> --- <!-- [monologue] [task review_comment_verification] [observations] - The `ReverseOrdOption` struct is defined in `src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs`. - The struct is used in `src/models/task.rs`, confirming its integration. - The `ReverseOrdOption` struct has several implementations, including `Eq`, `PartialOrd`, `Ord`, and `From`. [analysis] The `ReverseOrdOption` struct is properly defined and implemented within the `utils` module, specifically in `src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs`. Its usage in `src/models/task.rs` confirms that it is integrated into the application. There are no indications of missing definitions or unresolved dependencies related to this struct. The initial concern about ensuring proper integration and avoiding side effects is addressed by confirming the presence and usage of `ReverseOrdOption`. The integration appears to be correct, and there are no apparent issues with the `utils` module in this context. [actions] Conclude the verification process by confirming that the integration of the `utils` module is proper and does not introduce any side effects or unresolved dependencies. --> **Integration of `utils` module is verified and correct.** The `ReverseOrdOption` struct is properly defined in `src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs` and is used in `src/models/task.rs`, confirming its integration. There are no unresolved dependencies or side effects introduced by the `utils` module. The addition of the `utils` module is a positive step towards improving modularity and maintainability. </details> <details> <summary>Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify integration of `utils` module with the application. # Test: Search for usage of `utils` in the application files. Expect: Proper integration. rg --type rust -A 5 $'utils' ``` Length of output: 515 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of `reverse_ord_option` within the `utils` module. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'mod reverse_ord_option { $$$ }' # Check for any potential side effects or dependencies introduced by the `utils` module by searching for its usage across the codebase. rg --type rust 'utils::' ``` Length of output: 165 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of `ReverseOrdOption` across the entire codebase. rg --type rust 'ReverseOrdOption' ``` Length of output: 1083 </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/utils/reverse_ord_option.rs (5)</summary><blockquote> `3-7`: **Well-documented and correctly implemented struct.** The `ReverseOrdOption` struct is well-documented with clear comments explaining its purpose. The use of a lifetime parameter is appropriate for the context. --- `8-8`: **Correct implementation of `Eq` trait.** The `Eq` trait is correctly implemented, leveraging the derived `PartialEq` for equality checks. --- `10-14`: **Consistent and correct implementation of `PartialOrd`.** The implementation of `PartialOrd` correctly delegates to the `Ord` trait, ensuring consistent ordering logic. --- `16-25`: **Custom logic in `Ord` implementation is correct and well-implemented.** The `Ord` trait implementation provides the necessary logic to reverse the default ordering of `Option`s, handling all cases correctly. --- `27-31`: **Useful and straightforward `From` implementation.** The implementation of the `From` trait for `ReverseOrdOption` is straightforward and enhances usability by allowing easy conversions from `&Option<T>`. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/models/project.rs (3)</summary><blockquote> `39-39`: **Appropriate implementation of `Eq` trait.** The `Eq` trait is correctly implemented for `Project`, leveraging the derived `PartialEq`. --- `41-45`: **Consistent and correct implementation of `PartialOrd`.** The `PartialOrd` trait for `Project` correctly uses the `cmp` method from the `Ord` trait, ensuring consistent ordering logic. --- `47-51`: **Logical and effective `Ord` implementation.** The `Ord` trait implementation for `Project` is logical, using the `title` field for comparison, which supports the sorting functionality required by the PR objectives. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/components/pages/projects_page.rs (1)</summary><blockquote> `15-32`: **Well-implemented sorting logic enhances user experience.** The addition of sorting logic in the `ProjectsPage` component is well-implemented. Cloning the `projects` collection before sorting ensures that the original data is not modified, which is a good practice. Sorting the projects before rendering provides a consistent user experience. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/models/subtask.rs (2)</summary><blockquote> `52-52`: **Approved: `Eq` trait implementation for `Subtask`.** The implementation is straightforward and correct as it leverages the derived `PartialEq`. --- `54-58`: **Approved: `PartialOrd` trait implementation for `Subtask`.** The implementation correctly delegates to the `Ord` trait's `cmp` method, ensuring consistent behavior between `PartialOrd` and `Ord`. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/components/bottom_panel.rs (1)</summary><blockquote> `44-44`: **Height adjustment in expanded state approved, verify UI impact.** The change from `448px` to `506px` in the expanded state of the `BottomPanel` is approved as it likely enhances user experience by providing more space. However, it's crucial to verify that this adjustment does not negatively impact the layout or interaction with other UI components. Run the following script to verify the UI impact: </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/models/task.rs (1)</summary><blockquote> `111-123`: **Delegated comparison logic approved.** The implementation of comparison traits (`Eq`, `PartialOrd`, `Ord`) for `TaskWithSubtasks` is approved. Delegating the comparison to the `Task` ensures consistency and efficiency in sorting `TaskWithSubtasks` based on the encapsulated `Task`. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/server/subtasks.rs (2)</summary><blockquote> `42-48`: **Approve error handling adjustments.** The adjustments to error handling in `get_subtasks_of_task` improve consistency across the system by using `ErrorVec<Error>`. This change simplifies the error handling mechanism, making it more uniform and easier to maintain. --- `85-97`: **Approve error handling adjustments.** The adjustments to error handling in `restore_subtasks_of_task` improve consistency across the system by using `ErrorVec<Error>`. This change simplifies the error handling mechanism, making it more uniform and easier to maintain. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/components/pages/category_today_page.rs (1)</summary><blockquote> `9-9`: **Approved import addition.** The addition of `TaskListItem` is necessary for the new component usage. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/server/tasks.rs (1)</summary><blockquote> `163-163`: **Approved streamlined error handling.** The use of the `?` operator in `complete_task` simplifies error handling and improves code readability. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
src/components/subtasks_form.rs
@@ -65,2 +65,4 @@
QueryResult::Ok(QueryValue::Subtasks(subtasks))
| QueryResult::Loading(Some(QueryValue::Subtasks(subtasks))) => {
let mut subtasks = subtasks.clone();
subtasks.sort();
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-09 17:01:00 +00:00
Copy Link

Consider performance implications of cloning and sorting subtasks.

The addition of sorting to the subtasks is a great feature for improving the user interface. However, cloning and then sorting the entire list of subtasks could be performance-intensive, especially with a large number of subtasks. Consider optimizing this by sorting the subtasks in place if the data structure allows, or by using more efficient sorting algorithms or data structures that maintain order.

**Consider performance implications of cloning and sorting subtasks.** The addition of sorting to the subtasks is a great feature for improving the user interface. However, cloning and then sorting the entire list of subtasks could be performance-intensive, especially with a large number of subtasks. Consider optimizing this by sorting the subtasks in place if the data structure allows, or by using more efficient sorting algorithms or data structures that maintain order. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
src/components/subtasks_form.rs
@@ -67,3 +69,3 @@
rsx! {
for subtask in subtasks.clone() {
for subtask in subtasks {
div {
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-09 17:01:00 +00:00
Copy Link

Optimize cloning within the rendering loop.

Each iteration of the loop clones subtask and task multiple times, which can lead to significant performance overhead, especially with a large number of subtasks. Consider restructuring the code to minimize cloning, possibly by using references or restructuring the data flow to reduce the need for cloning.

Improve error handling strategy.

The use of panic! in the default case of the match statement handling query results is a risky approach that could lead to crashes in production. Consider replacing this with a more user-friendly error message or a recovery strategy that does not terminate the application.

**Optimize cloning within the rendering loop.** Each iteration of the loop clones `subtask` and `task` multiple times, which can lead to significant performance overhead, especially with a large number of subtasks. Consider restructuring the code to minimize cloning, possibly by using references or restructuring the data flow to reduce the need for cloning. --- **Improve error handling strategy.** The use of `panic!` in the default case of the match statement handling query results is a risky approach that could lead to crashes in production. Consider replacing this with a more user-friendly error message or a recovery strategy that does not terminate the application. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
src/components/task_list.rs
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-09 17:00:59 +00:00
Copy Link

Refactor suggested for sorting logic.

The introduction of TaskListItem for rendering tasks is approved for enhancing modularity and maintainability. However, consider optimizing the sorting logic, especially if the list of tasks is large. Sorting could be done at the data fetching or state management level to avoid re-sorting on each component render.

**Refactor suggested for sorting logic.** The introduction of `TaskListItem` for rendering tasks is approved for enhancing modularity and maintainability. However, consider optimizing the sorting logic, especially if the list of tasks is large. Sorting could be done at the data fetching or state management level to avoid re-sorting on each component render. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
src/components/task_list_item.rs
@@ -0,0 +58,4 @@
}
}
}
}
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-09 17:00:59 +00:00
Copy Link

Approved: TaskListItem component implementation.

The component is well-implemented with effective use of conditional rendering and UI elements. The handling of tasks, deadlines, and subtasks is appropriate and enhances user interaction.

Consider adding comments to complex conditional blocks for better maintainability and readability, especially for new developers or when revisiting the code later.

**Approved: `TaskListItem` component implementation.** The component is well-implemented with effective use of conditional rendering and UI elements. The handling of tasks, deadlines, and subtasks is appropriate and enhances user interaction. Consider adding comments to complex conditional blocks for better maintainability and readability, especially for new developers or when revisiting the code later. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
src/errors/subtask_error.rs
@@ -56,0 +57,4 @@
fn from(error_vec: ErrorVec<Error>) -> Self {
Vec::from(error_vec).into_iter()
.map(SubtaskError::Error).collect::<Vec<SubtaskError>>().into()
}
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-09 17:00:59 +00:00
Copy Link

Approved: Conversion from ErrorVec<Error> to ErrorVec<SubtaskError>.

The implementation is correct and enhances the error handling capabilities by allowing seamless integration of generic errors into SubtaskError. This is a valuable addition for robust error management.

Consider adding error logging at this conversion point to aid in debugging and maintaining error traceability.

**Approved: Conversion from `ErrorVec<Error>` to `ErrorVec<SubtaskError>`.** The implementation is correct and enhances the error handling capabilities by allowing seamless integration of generic errors into `SubtaskError`. This is a valuable addition for robust error management. Consider adding error logging at this conversion point to aid in debugging and maintaining error traceability. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
src/models/subtask.rs
@@ -51,3 +66,4 @@
#[derive(Insertable, Serialize, Deserialize, Validate, Clone, Debug)]
#[diesel(table_name = subtasks)]
pub struct NewSubtask {
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-09 17:00:59 +00:00
Copy Link

Approved: Ord trait implementation for Subtask.

The dual-layered comparison logic is well-implemented, prioritizing completion status and then ordering by creation timestamps. This is logical and efficient for the intended use case.

However, consider caching the results of is_completed() and created_at() if they are called frequently in performance-critical sections.

**Approved: `Ord` trait implementation for `Subtask`.** The dual-layered comparison logic is well-implemented, prioritizing completion status and then ordering by creation timestamps. This is logical and efficient for the intended use case. However, consider caching the results of `is_completed()` and `created_at()` if they are called frequently in performance-critical sections. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
src/models/task.rs
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-09 17:01:00 +00:00
Copy Link

Complex comparison logic approved, suggest adding unit tests.

The implementation of comparison traits (Eq, PartialOrd, Ord) for Task is approved as it enables sorting based on various criteria. However, due to the complexity of the comparison logic, it is crucial to add comprehensive unit tests to ensure that the behavior is as expected across all categories and edge cases.

Would you like me to help in writing these unit tests or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task?

**Complex comparison logic approved, suggest adding unit tests.** The implementation of comparison traits (`Eq`, `PartialOrd`, `Ord`) for `Task` is approved as it enables sorting based on various criteria. However, due to the complexity of the comparison logic, it is crucial to add comprehensive unit tests to ensure that the behavior is as expected across all categories and edge cases. Would you like me to help in writing these unit tests or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task? <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
src/server/subtasks.rs
@@ -112,2 +113,4 @@
.returning(Subtask::as_returning())
.get_result(&mut connection)
.map_err::<ErrorVec<Error>, _>(|error| vec![error.into()].into())?;
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-09 17:01:00 +00:00
Copy Link

Tip

Codebase Verification

Inconsistent error handling in delete_subtask.

The error handling for trigger_task_updated_at in create_subtask and edit_subtask is consistent, using map_err to convert the error type. However, delete_subtask does not follow this pattern, which may lead to inconsistencies in error handling across the codebase. Consider reviewing and aligning the error handling in delete_subtask with the other functions.

  • src/server/subtasks.rs: Review error handling in delete_subtask.
Analysis chain

Approve timestamp update integration, suggest verifying error handling.

The integration of trigger_task_updated_at in edit_subtask is consistent with the changes made in create_subtask, ensuring that the parent task's timestamp is updated upon subtask modification. The error handling appears correct, but consistency across the system should be verified.

Run the following script to verify the error handling consistency:

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify error handling consistency for `trigger_task_updated_at`.

# Test: Search for error handling patterns. Expect: Consistent error mapping.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'trigger_task_updated_at'

Length of output: 1617

> [!TIP] > Codebase Verification **Inconsistent error handling in `delete_subtask`.** The error handling for `trigger_task_updated_at` in `create_subtask` and `edit_subtask` is consistent, using `map_err` to convert the error type. However, `delete_subtask` does not follow this pattern, which may lead to inconsistencies in error handling across the codebase. Consider reviewing and aligning the error handling in `delete_subtask` with the other functions. - `src/server/subtasks.rs`: Review error handling in `delete_subtask`. <details> <summary>Analysis chain</summary> **Approve timestamp update integration, suggest verifying error handling.** The integration of `trigger_task_updated_at` in `edit_subtask` is consistent with the changes made in `create_subtask`, ensuring that the parent task's timestamp is updated upon subtask modification. The error handling appears correct, but consistency across the system should be verified. Run the following script to verify the error handling consistency: </details> <details> <summary>Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling consistency for `trigger_task_updated_at`. # Test: Search for error handling patterns. Expect: Consistent error mapping. rg --type rust -A 5 $'trigger_task_updated_at' ``` Length of output: 1617 </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
src/server/subtasks.rs
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-09 17:01:00 +00:00
Copy Link

Tip

Codebase Verification

Inconsistent error handling for trigger_task_updated_at in delete_subtask.

The error handling for the trigger_task_updated_at function in the delete_subtask function does not explicitly map errors, unlike other instances in the same file where errors are mapped to ErrorVec<SubtaskError>. This inconsistency could lead to potential issues if the error types are not compatible or expected by the calling function. Consider aligning the error handling with other usages to ensure consistency and prevent unexpected behavior.

  • File: src/server/subtasks.rs
  • Function: delete_subtask
Analysis chain

Approve integration of timestamp updates, suggest verifying error handling.

The addition of trigger_task_updated_at after deleting a subtask is a good practice for maintaining data integrity. The error handling for this function appears to be correctly implemented, mapping errors from the asynchronous call to ErrorVec<Error>.

However, ensure that the error types throughout the system are consistent and correctly mapped, especially when integrating new asynchronous calls.

Run the following script to verify the error handling consistency:

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify error handling consistency for `trigger_task_updated_at`.

# Test: Search for error handling patterns. Expect: Consistent error mapping.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'trigger_task_updated_at'

Length of output: 1617

> [!TIP] > Codebase Verification **Inconsistent error handling for `trigger_task_updated_at` in `delete_subtask`.** The error handling for the `trigger_task_updated_at` function in the `delete_subtask` function does not explicitly map errors, unlike other instances in the same file where errors are mapped to `ErrorVec<SubtaskError>`. This inconsistency could lead to potential issues if the error types are not compatible or expected by the calling function. Consider aligning the error handling with other usages to ensure consistency and prevent unexpected behavior. - **File:** `src/server/subtasks.rs` - **Function:** `delete_subtask` <details> <summary>Analysis chain</summary> **Approve integration of timestamp updates, suggest verifying error handling.** The addition of `trigger_task_updated_at` after deleting a subtask is a good practice for maintaining data integrity. The error handling for this function appears to be correctly implemented, mapping errors from the asynchronous call to `ErrorVec<Error>`. However, ensure that the error types throughout the system are consistent and correctly mapped, especially when integrating new asynchronous calls. Run the following script to verify the error handling consistency: </details> <details> <summary>Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling consistency for `trigger_task_updated_at`. # Test: Search for error handling patterns. Expect: Consistent error mapping. rg --type rust -A 5 $'trigger_task_updated_at' ``` Length of output: 1617 </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
src/server/tasks.rs
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-09 17:01:00 +00:00
Copy Link

Approved new function with a minor suggestion.

The function trigger_task_updated_at is well-implemented and follows consistent error handling practices. It effectively updates the updated_at timestamp, which is crucial for accurate time tracking.

Consider adding detailed logging at key steps (e.g., before updating the database and after successful update) to aid in debugging and monitoring.

**Approved new function with a minor suggestion.** The function `trigger_task_updated_at` is well-implemented and follows consistent error handling practices. It effectively updates the `updated_at` timestamp, which is crucial for accurate time tracking. Consider adding detailed logging at key steps (e.g., before updating the database and after successful update) to aid in debugging and monitoring. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
src/utils/mod.rs
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
pub(crate) mod reverse_ord_option;
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-09 17:00:59 +00:00
Copy Link

Approve module declaration but recommend adding documentation.

The module declaration pub(crate) mod reverse_ord_option; is correctly scoped for internal crate usage. However, it would be beneficial to add documentation to explain the purpose and functionality of this module, especially since it is a new addition to the codebase.

Would you like me to help draft initial documentation for this module?

**Approve module declaration but recommend adding documentation.** The module declaration `pub(crate) mod reverse_ord_option;` is correctly scoped for internal crate usage. However, it would be beneficial to add documentation to explain the purpose and functionality of this module, especially since it is a new addition to the codebase. Would you like me to help draft initial documentation for this module? <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2024-09-09 17:09:17 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
coderabbitai[bot]
Labels
Clear labels
bug
feature
refactor
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
matous-volf
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: matous-volf/todo-baggins#42
No description provided.
Delete Branch "feat/list-sorting"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?