feat: ability to complete a task #35
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "feat/task-complete"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
TaskListcomponent for better state management and UI responsiveness.ReoccurrenceandReoccurrenceIntervaltypes with new methods and comparisons.Bug Fixes
Walkthrough
The changes introduced in the Rust project include the addition of a new dependency (
timecrate) for date and time manipulation, enhancements to theTaskListcomponent for improved task management and UI responsiveness, modifications to theReoccurrenceIntervalenum andReoccurrencestruct for better handling of recurring tasks, and the implementation of new asynchronous functions for task retrieval and completion in the server's task management system.Changes
Cargo.tomltime = "0.3.36".src/components/task_list.rssrc/models/category.rsPartialEqtoReoccurrenceIntervalenum and newstart_datemethod toReoccurrencestruct.src/models/task.rsFromtrait for convertingTasktoNewTask.src/server/tasks.rsget_taskandcomplete_taskfunctions for task retrieval and completion, including date adjustments for recurring tasks.Sequence Diagram(s)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Share
Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.Generate unit testing code for this file.Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.@coderabbitai modularize this function.@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai helpto get help.Other keywords and placeholders
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.CodeRabbit Configuration File (
.coderabbit.yaml).coderabbit.yamlfile to the root of your repository.# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.jsonDocumentation and Community
Actionable comments posted: 5
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between
58ed449252anda12d558839.Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockFiles selected for processing (5)
Additional comments not posted (5)
@@ -57,0 +68,4 @@class: "mt-1 grow font-medium",{task.title()}},div {Refactoring of task rendering and event handling logic.
The refactoring of the task rendering logic using
mapandcloneimproves readability and immutability. The conditional rendering for task properties and CSS class determination is well-implemented and concise.The asynchronous
onclickevent handler for task completion is a significant enhancement. It correctly usesasync moveto handle the task completion without blocking the UI, followed by invalidating queries to update the UI state. This is a robust implementation that leverages modern Rust asynchronous programming practices.Consider adding error handling for the
complete_taskfunction within theasync moveblock to manage potential failures gracefully.@@ -85,3 +85,3 @@#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Hash, Clone, Debug)]#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, PartialEq, Hash, Clone, Debug)]pub enum ReoccurrenceInterval {Approved: Enhancements to
ReoccurrenceIntervalandReoccurrence.The addition of
PartialEqtoReoccurrenceIntervaland the newstart_datemethod inReoccurrenceare beneficial for improving the model's functionality and encapsulation. Consider adding documentation for the newstart_datemethod to clarify its usage and purpose.Also applies to: 105-107
@@ -72,0 +74,4 @@fn from(task: Task) -> Self {Self::new(task.title, task.deadline, task.category, task.project_id)}}Approved: Implementation of
From<Task> for NewTask.The new implementation for converting a
Taskinstance to aNewTaskis well-implemented and promotes code reuse and simplicity. Consider adding unit tests to cover this new functionality to ensure it behaves as expected.Would you like me to help with writing the unit tests for this conversion?
Implementation of the
get_taskfunction.The
get_taskfunction is well-implemented for retrieving a task by its ID. The use ofoptional()and error handling patterns are appropriate. However, theunwrap()in line 50 could lead to runtime panics if the task is not found.Consider replacing
unwrap()with proper error handling to avoid potential runtime errors. Here's a suggested change:Complex logic for handling task completion and reoccurrence.
The
complete_taskfunction introduces complex logic for handling different reoccurrence intervals and updating task dates accordingly. The use of thetimecrate functions for date calculations is appropriate and ensures accuracy.However, the error handling in line 135 could be improved by providing more specific error messages or logging the error details.
Enhance error handling by adding specific error messages or logging for better debugging and maintenance. Here's a suggested change:
Consider modularizing the date adjustment logic into a separate function to improve readability and maintainability.