matous-volf/todo-baggins
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 26 Pull Requests Actions Projects 1 Activity

feat: ability to delete a project #37

Merged
matous-volf merged 4 commits from feat/project-delete into main 2024-09-08 06:39:56 +00:00
Conversation 6 Commits 4 Files Changed 6 +51 -16
matous-volf commented 2024-09-08 06:22:54 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced functionality to delete projects within the Project Form component.
    • Added a button to trigger project deletion, enhancing project management capabilities.

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling by enabling automatic conversion of database-related errors to application-specific error types.

  • Documentation

    • Updated error handling documentation to reflect new implementations and improvements for better clarity.

  • Style

    • Enhanced code readability by adopting the use of Self for type references in error handling implementations.

  • Chores

    • Modified foreign key constraint behavior in the tasks table to improve data integrity when projects are deleted.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced functionality to delete projects within the Project Form component. - Added a button to trigger project deletion, enhancing project management capabilities. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved error handling by enabling automatic conversion of database-related errors to application-specific error types. - **Documentation** - Updated error handling documentation to reflect new implementations and improvements for better clarity. - **Style** - Enhanced code readability by adopting the use of `Self` for type references in error handling implementations. - **Chores** - Modified foreign key constraint behavior in the tasks table to improve data integrity when projects are deleted. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-09-08 06:23:05 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new feature for deleting projects within the ProjectForm component, enhancing its existing capabilities for creating and editing projects. An asynchronous delete_project function has been implemented in the server module, and error handling has been updated across various error modules. Additionally, the layout of the ProjectForm has been adjusted for improved button alignment, and handling of optional project references has been refined.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/project_form.rs Added functionality for deleting a project, including a new button and control flow modifications. Updated import statements and adjusted button layout. Improved handling of optional project references.
src/errors/error.rs Introduced From trait implementation for converting diesel::result::Error to a custom Error type. Modified Display and FromStr implementations to use Self for improved readability.
src/errors/project_error.rs Updated From and FromStr implementations to use Self instead of explicit type references, enhancing code clarity.
src/errors/task_error.rs Modified From and FromStr implementations to use Self for type references, improving readability and consistency.
src/server/projects.rs Added a new asynchronous function delete_project to handle project deletion by project_id, including error handling for database operations.
migrations/2024-08-19-105140_create_tasks/up.sql Modified foreign key constraint on project_id in the tasks table to include ON DELETE SET NULL, preventing loss of task records when a project is deleted.

Possibly related PRs

  • #32: This PR relates to the BottomPanel component's enhancements for task editing, sharing a context of form modifications.
  • #35: Updates in the TaskList component for task completion are relevant due to their involvement with asynchronous operations, similar to the new delete functionality in the ProjectForm.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- walkthrough_start --> ## Walkthrough The changes introduce a new feature for deleting projects within the `ProjectForm` component, enhancing its existing capabilities for creating and editing projects. An asynchronous `delete_project` function has been implemented in the server module, and error handling has been updated across various error modules. Additionally, the layout of the `ProjectForm` has been adjusted for improved button alignment, and handling of optional project references has been refined. ## Changes | File | Change Summary | |----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | `src/components/project_form.rs` | Added functionality for deleting a project, including a new button and control flow modifications. Updated import statements and adjusted button layout. Improved handling of optional project references. | | `src/errors/error.rs` | Introduced `From` trait implementation for converting `diesel::result::Error` to a custom `Error` type. Modified `Display` and `FromStr` implementations to use `Self` for improved readability. | | `src/errors/project_error.rs` | Updated `From` and `FromStr` implementations to use `Self` instead of explicit type references, enhancing code clarity. | | `src/errors/task_error.rs` | Modified `From` and `FromStr` implementations to use `Self` for type references, improving readability and consistency. | | `src/server/projects.rs` | Added a new asynchronous function `delete_project` to handle project deletion by `project_id`, including error handling for database operations. | | `migrations/2024-08-19-105140_create_tasks/up.sql` | Modified foreign key constraint on `project_id` in the `tasks` table to include `ON DELETE SET NULL`, preventing loss of task records when a project is deleted. | ## Possibly related PRs - **#32**: This PR relates to the `BottomPanel` component's enhancements for task editing, sharing a context of form modifications. - **#35**: Updates in the `TaskList` component for task completion are relevant due to their involvement with asynchronous operations, similar to the new delete functionality in the `ProjectForm`. <!-- walkthrough_end --><!-- This is an auto-generated comment: raw summary by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- # Existing changesets src/components/project_form.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The changes in the `ProjectForm` component of the `src/components/project_form.rs` file introduce new functionality for deleting a project in addition to the existing capabilities for creating and editing projects. The import statements have been updated to include the `delete_project` function from the `server::projects` module, indicating that this functionality is now part of the component's operations. The control flow within the `ProjectForm` component has been modified to accommodate the new delete functionality. A new button has been added to the form, which triggers an asynchronous operation to delete the project when clicked. This operation checks if a project exists and, if so, calls the `delete_project` function with the project's ID. After the deletion, it invalidates the project queries to ensure that the UI reflects the current state of the data. The `on_successful_submit` callback is invoked regardless of whether a project was deleted or a new project was created, ensuring consistent behavior after any action. Additionally, the layout of the buttons has been adjusted from a "justify-end" alignment to a "justify-between" alignment, which may enhance the visual presentation of the buttons within the form. The initial value for the title input field has also been modified to use `project.as_ref()` instead of directly mapping over `project`, which improves the handling of the optional project reference. Overall, these changes enhance the functionality of the `ProjectForm` component by allowing users to delete projects while maintaining the existing create and edit capabilities, thereby improving the component's usability and responsiveness to user actions. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `async fn delete_project(project_id: ProjectId)` in `src/server/projects.rs` - Modified: `pub(crate) fn ProjectForm(project: Option<Project>, on_successful_submit: EventHandler<()>)` in `src/components/project_form.rs` (no signature change, but functionality expanded to include delete operation) --- src/errors/error.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces a new implementation of the `From` trait for the `Error` enum, allowing for the conversion from `diesel::result::Error` to the custom `Error` type. This enhancement facilitates better error handling by enabling the automatic conversion of database-related errors into a more application-specific error type, specifically mapping all `diesel::result::Error` instances to `Error::ServerInternal`. Additionally, the diff modifies the `Display` implementation for the `Error` enum. The change involves replacing the explicit enum variant reference `Error::ServerInternal` with the more concise `Self::ServerInternal`. This adjustment improves code readability and consistency by utilizing the `Self` keyword, which is a common practice in Rust to refer to the current type within its own implementation block. Furthermore, the `FromStr` implementation for the `Error` enum also reflects a similar change, where the reference to the enum variant is updated from `Error::ServerInternal` to `Self::ServerInternal`. This change maintains the same functionality but enhances the clarity and maintainability of the code by adhering to the idiomatic use of `Self`. Overall, the changes streamline the error handling process and improve the code's adherence to Rust conventions, while maintaining the existing functionality of the `Error` enum. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `impl From<diesel::result::Error> for Error` in `src/errors/error.rs` - Modified: `fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>)` in `impl Display for Error` in `src/errors/error.rs` (changed `Error::ServerInternal` to `Self::ServerInternal`) - Modified: `fn from_str(s: &str) -> Result<Self, Self::Err>` in `impl FromStr for Error` in `src/errors/error.rs` (changed `Error::ServerInternal` to `Self::ServerInternal`) --- src/errors/project_error.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces modifications to the `ProjectError` implementation in the `src/errors/project_error.rs` file, specifically in the conversion implementations from `diesel::result::Error` and the `FromStr` trait. The primary change is the replacement of the explicit type reference `ProjectError` with the shorthand `Self` in the return statements of both conversion functions. This adjustment enhances code readability and maintainability by utilizing the `Self` keyword, which refers to the implementing type, thereby reducing redundancy. In the `From` trait implementation for `diesel::result::Error`, the conversion now returns `Self::Error(Error::ServerInternal)` instead of `ProjectError::Error(Error::ServerInternal)`. Similarly, in the `FromStr` trait implementation, the return statement has been updated to `Ok(Self::Error(Error::ServerInternal))` from `Ok(ProjectError::Error(Error::ServerInternal))`. These changes do not alter the functional behavior of the code but streamline the syntax, making it clearer and more concise. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Modified: `fn from(_: diesel::result::Error) -> Self` in `impl From<diesel::result::Error> for ProjectError` in `src/errors/project_error.rs` - Modified: `fn from_str(_: &str) -> Result<Self, Self::Err>` in `impl FromStr for ProjectError` in `src/errors/project_error.rs` --- src/errors/task_error.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces modifications to the `TaskError` implementation in the `src/errors/task_error.rs` file, specifically in the handling of error variants. The changes primarily involve the use of `Self` to refer to the `TaskError` type instead of explicitly naming it. This adjustment enhances the clarity and maintainability of the code by promoting the use of the type alias `Self`, which is a common practice in Rust to refer to the implementing type within its own implementation block. In the `From<diesel::result::Error>` implementation, the match arms that previously returned `TaskError::ProjectNotFound` and `TaskError::Error(Error::ServerInternal)` have been updated to use `Self::ProjectNotFound` and `Self::Error(Error::ServerInternal)`, respectively. This change does not alter the logic or the control flow of the error handling but streamlines the syntax, making it more idiomatic. Similarly, in the `FromStr` implementation for `TaskError`, the return statement has been modified from `Ok(TaskError::Error(Error::ServerInternal))` to `Ok(Self::Error(Error::ServerInternal))`. Again, this change maintains the same functionality while improving code readability and consistency. Overall, the changes reflect a shift towards a more idiomatic Rust style by utilizing `Self` for type references, which can help prevent potential issues during refactoring and enhance the overall clarity of the code. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - No changes to the declarations of exported or public entities were made in the provided diff. --- src/server/projects.rs: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces a new asynchronous function, `delete_project`, to the `src/server/projects.rs` file. This function is designed to handle the deletion of a project identified by its `project_id`. The function is marked with the `#[server]` attribute, indicating that it is intended for server-side operations. The `delete_project` function takes a single parameter, `project_id`, of type `i32`, and returns a `Result` type that encapsulates either a successful completion with no value (`()`) or an error of type `ServerFnError<ErrorVec<Error>>`. This error handling mechanism allows for the propagation of specific errors that may occur during the execution of the function. Inside the function, a database connection is established using the `establish_database_connection` function. If the connection fails, it maps the error to a vector containing a `ServerInternal` error, ensuring that the caller receives a meaningful error response. The core functionality of the function involves executing a delete operation on the `projects` table, filtering by the provided `project_id`. If the deletion encounters an error, it similarly maps this error into a vector format for consistent error handling. The addition of this function enhances the project's functionality by allowing for the removal of projects from the database, thereby improving the overall management of project data within the application. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Added: `pub(crate) async fn delete_project(project_id: i32) -> Result<(), ServerFnError<ErrorVec<Error>>>` in `src/server/projects.rs` # New changesets migrations/2024-08-19-105140_create_tasks/up.sql: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff indicates a modification to the foreign key constraint on the `project_id` column in the `tasks` table within the SQL migration file. The original foreign key constraint simply referenced the `id` column of the `projects` table, establishing a relationship between the two tables. The change introduces an `ON DELETE SET NULL` clause to this foreign key constraint. This alteration modifies the behavior of the database when a referenced project is deleted. Instead of cascading the delete operation (which would remove the associated tasks), the new behavior will set the `project_id` field in the `tasks` table to `NULL` for any tasks that were linked to the deleted project. This change enhances data integrity by preventing the loss of task records when a project is removed, allowing tasks to remain in the database without a valid project association. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - Modified: `FOREIGN KEY ("project_id") REFERENCES "projects"("id")` in `migrations/2024-08-19-105140_create_tasks/up.sql` → `FOREIGN KEY ("project_id") REFERENCES "projects"("id") ON DELETE SET NULL` in `migrations/2024-08-19-105140_create_tasks/up.sql` --> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: raw summary by coderabbit.ai --><!-- This is an auto-generated comment: pr objectives by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- ## PR summary This pull request introduces a new feature that allows users to delete a project within the application. The title of the pull request is "feat: ability to delete a project," indicating that it adds functionality related to project management. The user responsible for this contribution is matous-volf, and the pull request is numbered 37. No additional description or context has been provided in the pull request, so the summary focuses solely on the title and the feature being implemented. The ability to delete a project is a significant addition, as it enhances the application's functionality by giving users more control over their projects. ## Updated Objectives Summary Title: feat: ability to delete a project Number: 37 User: matous-volf --> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: pr objectives by coderabbit.ai --><!-- commit_ids_reviewed_start --> <!-- d63fb0f28d52a01b80430f86e425d1e46d2292b0 --> <!-- ca1f862499b1a1c6c0658d4da9110ae15962f2ed --> <!-- commit_ids_reviewed_end --><!-- tips_start --> --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? <details> <summary>Share</summary> - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code) </details> <details> <summary>Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details> <!-- tips_end -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) requested changes 2024-09-08 06:25:58 +00:00
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment
Copy Link

Actionable comments posted: 3

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0299092fa7 and d63fb0f28d.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • src/components/project_form.rs (3 hunks)
  • src/errors/error.rs (2 hunks)
  • src/errors/project_error.rs (2 hunks)
  • src/errors/task_error.rs (2 hunks)
  • src/server/projects.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (7)
src/errors/error.rs (2)

20-20: Good use of Self keyword.

The change to use Self::ServerInternal improves readability and aligns with Rust idiomatic practices.

31-31: Consistent use of Self in FromStr implementation.

Using Self::ServerInternal enhances consistency and readability in the codebase.

src/errors/project_error.rs (2)

39-39: Good use of Self keyword in From implementation.

The change to use Self::Error(Error::ServerInternal) improves readability and aligns with Rust idiomatic practices.

55-55: Consistent use of Self in FromStr implementation.

Using Self::Error(Error::ServerInternal) enhances consistency and readability in the codebase.

src/errors/task_error.rs (2)

45-46: Good use of Self keyword in From implementation.

The changes to use Self::ProjectNotFound and Self::Error(Error::ServerInternal) improve readability and align with Rust idiomatic practices.

Also applies to: 50-50

68-68: Consistent use of Self in FromStr implementation.

Using Self::Error(Error::ServerInternal) enhances consistency and readability in the codebase.

src/components/project_form.rs (1)

52-69: Approve the UI adjustments for better alignment and handling of optional values.

The changes to the button alignment and the handling of the initial value for the title input field improve the usability and robustness of the ProjectForm component. The use of justify-between for button alignment helps in better spacing and visual appeal, while using project.as_ref() ensures safer handling of optional project references.

**Actionable comments posted: 3** <details> <summary>Review details</summary> **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: ASSERTIVE** <details> <summary>Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0299092fa7c8ee8d55776dc8f59bf11802f42e01 and d63fb0f28d52a01b80430f86e425d1e46d2292b0. </details> <details> <summary>Files selected for processing (5)</summary> * src/components/project_form.rs (3 hunks) * src/errors/error.rs (2 hunks) * src/errors/project_error.rs (2 hunks) * src/errors/task_error.rs (2 hunks) * src/server/projects.rs (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>Additional comments not posted (7)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/errors/error.rs (2)</summary><blockquote> `20-20`: **Good use of `Self` keyword.** The change to use `Self::ServerInternal` improves readability and aligns with Rust idiomatic practices. --- `31-31`: **Consistent use of `Self` in `FromStr` implementation.** Using `Self::ServerInternal` enhances consistency and readability in the codebase. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/errors/project_error.rs (2)</summary><blockquote> `39-39`: **Good use of `Self` keyword in `From` implementation.** The change to use `Self::Error(Error::ServerInternal)` improves readability and aligns with Rust idiomatic practices. --- `55-55`: **Consistent use of `Self` in `FromStr` implementation.** Using `Self::Error(Error::ServerInternal)` enhances consistency and readability in the codebase. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/errors/task_error.rs (2)</summary><blockquote> `45-46`: **Good use of `Self` keyword in `From` implementation.** The changes to use `Self::ProjectNotFound` and `Self::Error(Error::ServerInternal)` improve readability and align with Rust idiomatic practices. Also applies to: 50-50 --- `68-68`: **Consistent use of `Self` in `FromStr` implementation.** Using `Self::Error(Error::ServerInternal)` enhances consistency and readability in the codebase. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/components/project_form.rs (1)</summary><blockquote> `52-69`: **Approve the UI adjustments for better alignment and handling of optional values.** The changes to the button alignment and the handling of the initial value for the title input field improve the usability and robustness of the `ProjectForm` component. The use of `justify-between` for button alignment helps in better spacing and visual appeal, while using `project.as_ref()` ensures safer handling of optional project references. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
src/components/project_form.rs
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-08 06:25:55 +00:00
Copy Link

Approve the integration of delete functionality with a suggestion for improvement.

The integration of the delete_project function in the ProjectForm component is well-implemented. The use of asynchronous handling and query invalidation after deletion ensures that the UI remains consistent with the backend state.

However, consider adding error handling for the delete operation to provide feedback to the user in case of failure.

Add error handling for the delete operation:

if let Some(project) = project {
    match delete_project(project.id()).await {
        Ok(_) => {
            query_client.invalidate_queries(&[QueryKey::Projects]);
            on_successful_submit.call(());
        },
        Err(e) => {
            // Handle error, e.g., show an error message to the user
        }
    }
}
**Approve the integration of delete functionality with a suggestion for improvement.** The integration of the `delete_project` function in the `ProjectForm` component is well-implemented. The use of asynchronous handling and query invalidation after deletion ensures that the UI remains consistent with the backend state. However, consider adding error handling for the delete operation to provide feedback to the user in case of failure. Add error handling for the delete operation: ```rust if let Some(project) = project { match delete_project(project.id()).await { Ok(_) => { query_client.invalidate_queries(&[QueryKey::Projects]); on_successful_submit.call(()); }, Err(e) => { // Handle error, e.g., show an error message to the user } } } ``` <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
src/errors/error.rs
@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
impl From<diesel::result::Error> for Error {
fn from(_: diesel::result::Error) -> Self {
Self::ServerInternal
}
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-08 06:25:55 +00:00
Copy Link

Refine error mapping in From implementation.

The current implementation maps all diesel::result::Error types to Error::ServerInternal. Consider refining this to differentiate between different types of database errors, such as constraint violations or connection issues, to provide more specific error messages to the client.

**Refine error mapping in `From` implementation.** The current implementation maps all `diesel::result::Error` types to `Error::ServerInternal`. Consider refining this to differentiate between different types of database errors, such as constraint violations or connection issues, to provide more specific error messages to the client. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
src/server/projects.rs
@@ -74,0 +84,4 @@
.map_err::<ErrorVec<Error>, _>(|error| vec![error.into()].into())?;
Ok(())
}
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-08 06:25:55 +00:00
Copy Link

Approve the implementation of delete_project with a suggestion for enhancement.

The implementation of delete_project is correct and aligns well with the existing codebase. The error handling is consistent and uses the application's custom error types effectively.

However, consider enhancing the database operation by wrapping it in a transaction. This ensures that any related operations that need to be atomic with the deletion are handled correctly.

Consider adding transaction handling to ensure atomicity:

let mut connection = establish_database_connection()
    .map_err::<ErrorVec<Error>, _>(|_| vec![Error::ServerInternal].into())?;

connection.transaction::<_, Error, _>(|| {
    diesel::delete(projects.filter(id.eq(project_id))).execute(&mut connection)
        .map_err::<ErrorVec<Error>, _>(|error| vec![error.into()].into())
});
**Approve the implementation of `delete_project` with a suggestion for enhancement.** The implementation of `delete_project` is correct and aligns well with the existing codebase. The error handling is consistent and uses the application's custom error types effectively. However, consider enhancing the database operation by wrapping it in a transaction. This ensures that any related operations that need to be atomic with the deletion are handled correctly. Consider adding transaction handling to ensure atomicity: ```rust let mut connection = establish_database_connection() .map_err::<ErrorVec<Error>, _>(|_| vec![Error::ServerInternal].into())?; connection.transaction::<_, Error, _>(|| { diesel::delete(projects.filter(id.eq(project_id))).execute(&mut connection) .map_err::<ErrorVec<Error>, _>(|error| vec![error.into()].into()) }); ``` <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
matous-volf (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-09-08 06:36:13 +00:00
src/server/projects.rs
@@ -74,0 +84,4 @@
.map_err::<ErrorVec<Error>, _>(|error| vec![error.into()].into())?;
Ok(())
}
matous-volf (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-08 06:36:13 +00:00
Copy Link

What's the point of a transaction when only one query is being executed?

What's the point of a transaction when only one query is being executed?
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-09-08 06:36:42 +00:00
src/server/projects.rs
@@ -74,0 +84,4 @@
.map_err::<ErrorVec<Error>, _>(|error| vec![error.into()].into())?;
Ok(())
}
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented 2024-09-08 06:36:42 +00:00
Copy Link

@matous-volf, you're right that a transaction is typically more useful when multiple queries are involved. In this case, since only one query is being executed, a transaction might seem unnecessary.

However, there are a few reasons why it could still be beneficial:

  1. Consistency: Even with a single query, a transaction ensures that the operation is either fully completed or fully rolled back in case of unexpected issues (e.g., database crashes or connection problems).
  2. Future-proofing: If additional operations (like cascading deletes or logging) are added later, the transaction ensures that all related operations are atomic.
  3. Locking behavior: In some databases, transactions can help manage locking more effectively, even for single queries.

That said, if you're confident that this single query is sufficient and no future operations will be added, the transaction may not be necessary in this specific case.

@matous-volf, you're right that a transaction is typically more useful when multiple queries are involved. In this case, since only one query is being executed, a transaction might seem unnecessary. However, there are a few reasons why it could still be beneficial: 1. **Consistency**: Even with a single query, a transaction ensures that the operation is either fully completed or fully rolled back in case of unexpected issues (e.g., database crashes or connection problems). 2. **Future-proofing**: If additional operations (like cascading deletes or logging) are added later, the transaction ensures that all related operations are atomic. 3. **Locking behavior**: In some databases, transactions can help manage locking more effectively, even for single queries. That said, if you're confident that this single query is sufficient and no future operations will be added, the transaction may not be necessary in this specific case. <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-09-08 06:37:53 +00:00
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment
Copy Link

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d63fb0f28d and ca1f862499.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • migrations/2024-08-19-105140_create_tasks/up.sql (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
migrations/2024-08-19-105140_create_tasks/up.sql (1)

9-9: Review of the modified foreign key constraint:

The modification to the foreign key constraint to include ON DELETE SET NULL is appropriate for the use case described. This change ensures that tasks remain in the database even if their associated project is deleted, which is beneficial for maintaining data integrity and historical data tracking.

However, it's important to consider the implications of having tasks with a NULL project_id:

  • Ensure that the application logic that consumes this table can handle tasks without an associated project.
  • Consider adding additional checks or constraints to ensure that tasks are still valid even when they are not associated with a project.

Overall, the SQL syntax is correct, and the logic aligns with the objectives of the PR.

**Actionable comments posted: 0** <details> <summary>Review details</summary> **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: ASSERTIVE** <details> <summary>Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d63fb0f28d52a01b80430f86e425d1e46d2292b0 and ca1f862499b1a1c6c0658d4da9110ae15962f2ed. </details> <details> <summary>Files selected for processing (1)</summary> * migrations/2024-08-19-105140_create_tasks/up.sql (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>Additional comments not posted (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>migrations/2024-08-19-105140_create_tasks/up.sql (1)</summary><blockquote> `9-9`: **Review of the modified foreign key constraint:** The modification to the foreign key constraint to include `ON DELETE SET NULL` is appropriate for the use case described. This change ensures that tasks remain in the database even if their associated project is deleted, which is beneficial for maintaining data integrity and historical data tracking. However, it's important to consider the implications of having tasks with a NULL `project_id`: - Ensure that the application logic that consumes this table can handle tasks without an associated project. - Consider adding additional checks or constraints to ensure that tasks are still valid even when they are not associated with a project. Overall, the SQL syntax is correct, and the logic aligns with the objectives of the PR. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2024-09-08 06:37:56 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
coderabbitai[bot]
Labels
Clear labels
bug
feature
refactor
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
matous-volf
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: matous-volf/todo-baggins#37
No description provided.
Delete Branch "feat/project-delete"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?