feat: ability to complete a task #35
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "feat/task-complete"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
TaskList
component for better state management and UI responsiveness.Reoccurrence
andReoccurrenceInterval
types with new methods and comparisons.Bug Fixes
Walkthrough
The changes introduced in the Rust project include the addition of a new dependency (
time
crate) for date and time manipulation, enhancements to theTaskList
component for improved task management and UI responsiveness, modifications to theReoccurrenceInterval
enum andReoccurrence
struct for better handling of recurring tasks, and the implementation of new asynchronous functions for task retrieval and completion in the server's task management system.Changes
Cargo.toml
time = "0.3.36"
.src/components/task_list.rs
src/models/category.rs
PartialEq
toReoccurrenceInterval
enum and newstart_date
method toReoccurrence
struct.src/models/task.rs
From
trait for convertingTask
toNewTask
.src/server/tasks.rs
get_task
andcomplete_task
functions for task retrieval and completion, including date adjustments for recurring tasks.Sequence Diagram(s)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Share
Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
Generate unit testing code for this file.
Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
@coderabbitai
in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
@coderabbitai modularize this function.
@coderabbitai
in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pause
to pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resume
to resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai review
to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full review
to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summary
to regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai resolve
resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configuration
to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai help
to get help.Other keywords and placeholders
@coderabbitai ignore
anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.@coderabbitai summary
to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.@coderabbitai
anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.CodeRabbit Configuration File (
.coderabbit.yaml
).coderabbit.yaml
file to the root of your repository.# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
Documentation and Community
Actionable comments posted: 5
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between
58ed449252
anda12d558839
.Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (5)
Additional comments not posted (5)
@ -57,0 +68,4 @@
class: "mt-1 grow font-medium",
{task.title()}
},
div {
Refactoring of task rendering and event handling logic.
The refactoring of the task rendering logic using
map
andclone
improves readability and immutability. The conditional rendering for task properties and CSS class determination is well-implemented and concise.The asynchronous
onclick
event handler for task completion is a significant enhancement. It correctly usesasync move
to handle the task completion without blocking the UI, followed by invalidating queries to update the UI state. This is a robust implementation that leverages modern Rust asynchronous programming practices.Consider adding error handling for the
complete_task
function within theasync move
block to manage potential failures gracefully.@ -85,3 +85,3 @@
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Hash, Clone, Debug)]
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, PartialEq, Hash, Clone, Debug)]
pub enum ReoccurrenceInterval {
Approved: Enhancements to
ReoccurrenceInterval
andReoccurrence
.The addition of
PartialEq
toReoccurrenceInterval
and the newstart_date
method inReoccurrence
are beneficial for improving the model's functionality and encapsulation. Consider adding documentation for the newstart_date
method to clarify its usage and purpose.Also applies to: 105-107
@ -72,0 +74,4 @@
fn from(task: Task) -> Self {
Self::new(task.title, task.deadline, task.category, task.project_id)
}
}
Approved: Implementation of
From<Task> for NewTask
.The new implementation for converting a
Task
instance to aNewTask
is well-implemented and promotes code reuse and simplicity. Consider adding unit tests to cover this new functionality to ensure it behaves as expected.Would you like me to help with writing the unit tests for this conversion?
Implementation of the
get_task
function.The
get_task
function is well-implemented for retrieving a task by its ID. The use ofoptional()
and error handling patterns are appropriate. However, theunwrap()
in line 50 could lead to runtime panics if the task is not found.Consider replacing
unwrap()
with proper error handling to avoid potential runtime errors. Here's a suggested change:Complex logic for handling task completion and reoccurrence.
The
complete_task
function introduces complex logic for handling different reoccurrence intervals and updating task dates accordingly. The use of thetime
crate functions for date calculations is appropriate and ensures accuracy.However, the error handling in line 135 could be improved by providing more specific error messages or logging the error details.
Enhance error handling by adding specific error messages or logging for better debugging and maintenance. Here's a suggested change:
Consider modularizing the date adjustment logic into a separate function to improve readability and maintainability.