feat: ability to create a project #9
@ -27,11 +27,7 @@ impl Project {
|
||||
|
|
||||
#[derive(Insertable, Serialize, Deserialize, Validate, Clone, Debug)]
|
||||
#[diesel(table_name = projects)]
|
||||
pub struct NewProject {
|
||||
#[validate(length(
|
||||
Consider making fields of The fields of the **Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 155 Script: Length of output: 156 Script: Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
min = "TITLE_LENGTH_MIN",
|
||||
|
Consider making fields of The fields of the **Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 155 Script: Length of output: 156 Script: Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
max = "TITLE_LENGTH_MAX",
|
||||
|
Consider making fields of The fields of the **Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 155 Script: Length of output: 156 Script: Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
code = "title_length"
|
||||
|
Consider making fields of The fields of the **Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 155 Script: Length of output: 156 Script: Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
))]
|
||||
|
Consider making fields of The fields of the **Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 155 Script: Length of output: 156 Script: Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
#[validate(length(min = "TITLE_LENGTH_MIN", max = "TITLE_LENGTH_MAX", code = "title_length"))]
|
||||
|
Consider making fields of The fields of the **Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 155 Script: Length of output: 156 Script: Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
pub title: String,
|
||||
Ensure direct reference of validation constants. The constants
Analysis chainEnsure validation constants are correctly referenced. The validation annotation for Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 765 Script: Length of output: 1061 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Ensure direct reference of validation constants.**
The constants `TITLE_LENGTH_MIN` and `TITLE_LENGTH_MAX` should be directly referenced in the validation annotation without quotes to ensure they are correctly evaluated.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Line:** 30
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure validation constants are correctly referenced.**
The validation annotation for `title` uses string literals for constants. Ensure these constants are correctly referenced and are effective during validation.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the validation constants are correctly referenced in the `NewProject` struct.
# Test: Search for the usage of validation constants. Expect: Correct usage in the `NewProject` struct.
rg --type rust 'TITLE_LENGTH_(MIN|MAX)' -A 5
```
Length of output: 765
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation or examples of using constants in validation attributes.
rg --type rust 'validate\(' -A 5
# Check for tests related to title validation.
fd -t f -e rs | xargs rg 'title_length'
```
Length of output: 1061
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
No, this is from the validator docs. No, this is from the validator docs.
@matous-volf, thanks for the clarification. If the usage aligns with the validator documentation, then it's appropriate as implemented. Let me know if there's anything else you'd like to address. <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user indicates that the usage of string literals for constants in the validation attribute is based on the validator documentation.
[analysis] It's possible that the validator library being used requires constants to be referenced as strings within the validation attributes. This might be a specific feature or requirement of the library.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's comment and confirm that the usage aligns with the validator documentation. No further action is needed regarding the code.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for the clarification. If the usage aligns with the validator documentation, then it's appropriate as implemented. Let me know if there's anything else you'd like to address.
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Consider making fields of The fields of the **Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
Consider making fields of The fields of the **Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 155 Script: Length of output: 156 Script: Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 155 Script: Length of output: 156 Script: Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
Consider making fields of
Projectstruct private.The fields of the
Projectstruct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.Consider making fields of
Projectstruct private.The fields of the
Projectstruct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.Consider using
Stringinstead of&'a strinNewProject.The
NewProjectstruct is instantiated with atitlefield derived from aStringusingas_str(), which suggests that the lifetime parameter'amight not be necessary. UsingStringdirectly for thetitlefield could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.src/models/project.rslet new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };Analysis chain
Ensure the lifetime
'ais necessary forNewProject.The
NewProjectstruct uses a lifetime parameter for thetitlefield. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider usingStringinstead to simplify the struct.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 155
Script:
Length of output: 156
Script:
Length of output: 1298
Consider using
Stringinstead of&'a strinNewProject.The
NewProjectstruct is instantiated with atitlefield derived from aStringusingas_str(), which suggests that the lifetime parameter'amight not be necessary. UsingStringdirectly for thetitlefield could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.src/models/project.rslet new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };Analysis chain
Ensure the lifetime
'ais necessary forNewProject.The
NewProjectstruct uses a lifetime parameter for thetitlefield. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider usingStringinstead to simplify the struct.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 155
Script:
Length of output: 156
Script:
Length of output: 1298
This is the default by the Diesel guide.
This is the default by the Diesel guide.
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of
&'a strinNewProjectis based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of
&'a strinNewProjectis based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!