feat: ability to create a project #9
@ -6,8 +6,18 @@ use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
|
||||
|
||||
#[diesel(table_name = crate::schema::projects)]
|
||||
#[diesel(check_for_backend(diesel::pg::Pg))]
|
||||
pub struct Project {
|
||||
pub(crate) id: i32,
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
pub(crate) title: String,
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
id: i32,
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
title: String,
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
impl Project {
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
pub fn id(&self) -> i32 {
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
self.id
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
pub fn title(&self) -> &str {
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
&self.title
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Insertable, Serialize, Deserialize)]
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Consider making fields of The fields of the
**Consider making fields of `Project` struct private.**
The fields of the `Project` struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.
```rust
pub struct Project {
id: i32,
title: String,
}
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]()
Consider using The
Analysis chainEnsure the lifetime The Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 155 Script:
Length of output: 156 Script:
Length of output: 1298 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Consider using `String` instead of `&'a str` in `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct is instantiated with a `title` field derived from a `String` using `as_str()`, which suggests that the lifetime parameter `'a` might not be necessary. Using `String` directly for the `title` field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.
- **File:** `src/models/project.rs`
- **Relevant Code:** `let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };`
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Ensure the lifetime `'a` is necessary for `NewProject`.**
The `NewProject` struct uses a lifetime parameter for the `title` field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider using `String` instead to simplify the struct.
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of the lifetime parameter in `NewProject`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `NewProject` to determine if the lifetime is required.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 5
```
Length of output: 155
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instantiations and usages of `NewProject` in the codebase to determine if the lifetime is necessary.
rg --type rust 'NewProject<' -A 10
```
Length of output: 156
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to `NewProject` in the codebase.
rg --type rust 'NewProject' -A 10
```
Length of output: 1298
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() This is the default by the Diesel guide. This is the default by the Diesel guide.
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
![]() @matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of <!-- [monologue]
[observations] The user has mentioned that using `&'a str` in the `NewProject` struct is the default approach recommended by the Diesel guide.
[analysis] Since the user is following the Diesel guide, it is reasonable to assume that the current implementation aligns with best practices as suggested by the Diesel documentation. The use of `&'a str` might be intended to optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary allocations when inserting new records.
[actions] Acknowledge the user's adherence to the Diesel guide and confirm that the current implementation is valid. No need to suggest changes.
-->
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of `&'a str` in `NewProject` is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!
<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
|
Consider making fields of
Project
struct private.The fields of the
Project
struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.Consider making fields of
Project
struct private.The fields of the
Project
struct are currently public within the crate. Consider making them private and providing accessor methods if needed to encapsulate the data and maintain control over how it's accessed or modified.Consider using
String
instead of&'a str
inNewProject
.The
NewProject
struct is instantiated with atitle
field derived from aString
usingas_str()
, which suggests that the lifetime parameter'a
might not be necessary. UsingString
directly for thetitle
field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.src/models/project.rs
let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };
Analysis chain
Ensure the lifetime
'a
is necessary forNewProject
.The
NewProject
struct uses a lifetime parameter for thetitle
field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider usingString
instead to simplify the struct.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 155
Script:
Length of output: 156
Script:
Length of output: 1298
Consider using
String
instead of&'a str
inNewProject
.The
NewProject
struct is instantiated with atitle
field derived from aString
usingas_str()
, which suggests that the lifetime parameter'a
might not be necessary. UsingString
directly for thetitle
field could simplify the struct by removing the need for a lifetime parameter.src/models/project.rs
let new_project = NewProject { title: title.as_str() };
Analysis chain
Ensure the lifetime
'a
is necessary forNewProject
.The
NewProject
struct uses a lifetime parameter for thetitle
field. Ensure that this is necessary for your use case. If not, consider usingString
instead to simplify the struct.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 155
Script:
Length of output: 156
Script:
Length of output: 1298
This is the default by the Diesel guide.
This is the default by the Diesel guide.
@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of
&'a str
inNewProject
is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!@matous-volf, thanks for clarifying that the use of
&'a str
inNewProject
is based on the Diesel guide. It's good to know that the implementation aligns with the recommended practices. If there's anything else you'd like to explore or adjust, feel free to let me know!