feat: ability to view tasks in a category #19
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
pub(crate) fn App() -> Element {
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "min-h-screen text-white bg-neutral-800",
|
||||
class: "min-h-screen text-zinc-200 bg-zinc-800",
|
||||
Router::<Route> {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
44
src/components/bottom_panel.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
||||
|
||||
use std::thread::sleep;
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::components::navigation::Navigation;
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::components::task_form::TaskForm;
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
pub(crate) fn BottomPanel(creating_task: bool) -> Element {
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
let mut expanded = use_signal(|| creating_task);
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
let navigation_expanded = use_signal(|| false);
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use_effect(use_reactive(&creating_task, move |creating_task| {
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
if creating_task {
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
expanded.set(true);
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
spawn(async move {
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
async_std::task::sleep(std::time::Duration::from_millis(500)).await;
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
expanded.set(false);
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
});
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}));
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
div {
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
class: format!(
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
"bg-zinc-700/50 rounded-t-xl border-t-zinc-600 border-t backdrop-blur drop-shadow-[0_-5px_10px_rgba(0,0,0,0.2)] transition-[height] duration-[500ms] ease-[cubic-bezier(0.79,0.14,0.15,0.86)] {}",
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
match (creating_task, navigation_expanded()) {
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
(false, false) => "h-[64px]",
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
(false, true) => "h-[128px]",
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
(true, _) => "h-[448px]",
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
),
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
if expanded() {
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
TaskForm {}
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
Navigation {
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
expanded: navigation_expanded,
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of the The
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` component.**
The `BottomPanel` component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of the
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles. **Review of the `BottomPanel` Component**
1. **Reactivity and State Management:**
- The use of `Signal<bool>` for `display_form` and the internal state management with `expanded` and `navigation_expanded` are appropriate for reactive UI updates.
- The `use_effect` hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on the `display_form`. However, the use of `async_std::task::sleep` for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.
2. **UI Responsiveness and Styling:**
- The dynamic class string construction at lines 26-34 is complex and could be simplified or documented for better maintainability. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function or using a more declarative approach to handle styles.
- The responsiveness handled by the `match` expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.
3. **Form Handling and Routing:**
- The conditional rendering based on `current_route` and `expanded` at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.
- The use of `ProjectForm` and `TaskForm` with `on_successful_submit` callbacks that modify the `display_form` state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.
4. **Performance Considerations:**
- The use of asynchronous sleep within a UI component could lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior during rapid state changes. Consider alternatives that are more integrated with the Dioxus lifecycle.
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
104
src/components/category_input.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
use crate::server::tasks::get_tasks_in_category;
|
||||
use chrono::NaiveDate;
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use std::fmt::format;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn CategoryInput(selected_category: Signal<Category>, class: Option<&'static str>) -> Element {
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: format!("flex flex-row gap-2 {}", class.unwrap_or("")),
|
||||
button {
|
||||
r#type: "button",
|
||||
class: format!(
|
||||
"py-2 rounded-lg grow basis-0 {}",
|
||||
if selected_category() == Category::SomedayMaybe { "bg-zinc-500/50" }
|
||||
else { "bg-zinc-800/50" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
onclick: move |_| {
|
||||
selected_category.set(Category::SomedayMaybe);
|
||||
},
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-question"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
button {
|
||||
r#type: "button",
|
||||
class: format!(
|
||||
"py-2 rounded-lg grow basis-0 {}",
|
||||
if selected_category() == Category::LongTerm { "bg-zinc-500/50" }
|
||||
else { "bg-zinc-800/50" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
onclick: move |_| {
|
||||
selected_category.set(Category::LongTerm);
|
||||
},
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-water"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
button {
|
||||
r#type: "button",
|
||||
class: format!(
|
||||
"py-2 rounded-lg grow basis-0 {}",
|
||||
if let Category::WaitingFor(_) = selected_category() { "bg-zinc-500/50" }
|
||||
else { "bg-zinc-800/50" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
onclick: move |_| {
|
||||
selected_category.set(Category::WaitingFor(String::new()));
|
||||
},
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-hourglass-half"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
button {
|
||||
r#type: "button",
|
||||
class: format!(
|
||||
"py-2 rounded-lg grow basis-0 {}",
|
||||
if selected_category() == Category::NextSteps { "bg-zinc-500/50" }
|
||||
else { "bg-zinc-800/50" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
onclick: move |_| {
|
||||
selected_category.set(Category::NextSteps);
|
||||
},
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-forward"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
button {
|
||||
r#type: "button",
|
||||
class: format!(
|
||||
"py-2 rounded-lg grow basis-0 {}",
|
||||
if let Category::Calendar { .. } = selected_category() { "bg-zinc-500/50" }
|
||||
else { "bg-zinc-800/50" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
onclick: move |_| {
|
||||
selected_category.set(Category::Calendar {
|
||||
date: NaiveDate::default(),
|
||||
reoccurrence: None,
|
||||
time: None,
|
||||
});
|
||||
},
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-calendar-days"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
button {
|
||||
r#type: "button",
|
||||
class: format!(
|
||||
"py-2 rounded-lg grow basis-0 {}",
|
||||
if selected_category() == Category::Inbox { "bg-zinc-500/50" }
|
||||
else { "bg-zinc-800/50" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
onclick: move |_| {
|
||||
selected_category.set(Category::Inbox);
|
||||
},
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-inbox"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
19
src/components/create_task_button.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn CreateTaskButton(creating: Signal<bool>) -> Element {
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
button {
|
||||
class: "m-4 py-3 px-5 self-end text-center bg-zinc-300/50 rounded-xl border-t-zinc-200 border-t backdrop-blur drop-shadow-[0_-5px_10px_rgba(0,0,0,0.2)] text-2xl text-zinc-200",
|
||||
onclick: move |_| {
|
||||
creating.set(!creating());
|
||||
},
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: format!("min-w-6 fa-solid {}", if creating() { "fa-xmark" } else { "fa-plus" }),
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Well-structured component with effective state management. The
However, consider simplifying the button's class attribute for better readability and maintainability:
Then use it in the
**Well-structured component with effective state management.**
The `CreateButton` component is well-implemented with clear use of Dioxus features:
- The `Signal<bool>` is effectively used for managing the button's state.
- The `rsx!` macro is correctly used to define the UI elements.
- The dynamic class and icon change based on the state provide good user feedback.
However, consider simplifying the button's class attribute for better readability and maintainability:
```rust
const BUTTON_CLASS: &str = "m-4 py-3 px-5 self-end text-center bg-zinc-300/50 rounded-xl border-t-zinc-200 border-t backdrop-blur drop-shadow-[0_-5px_10px_rgba(0,0,0,0.2)] text-2xl text-zinc-200";
```
Then use it in the `rsx!` block:
```rust
class: BUTTON_CLASS,
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
@ -1,13 +1,9 @@
|
||||
use crate::components::project_form::ProjectForm;
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_form::TaskForm;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn Home() -> Element {
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
ProjectForm {}
|
||||
TaskForm {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
30
src/components/layout.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
use crate::components::bottom_panel::BottomPanel;
|
||||
use crate::components::navigation::Navigation;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
use chrono::NaiveDate;
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use crate::components::create_task_button::CreateTaskButton;
|
||||
use crate::components::sticky_bottom::StickyBottom;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_form::TaskForm;
|
||||
use crate::server::tasks::get_tasks_in_category;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn Layout() -> Element {
|
||||
let creating_task = use_signal(|| false);
|
||||
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
Outlet::<Route> {}
|
||||
StickyBottom {
|
||||
CreateTaskButton {
|
||||
creating: creating_task,
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Component structure is well-organized and functional. The use of Consider adding comments to describe the purpose of each component within the layout, especially for complex nested structures, to enhance readability and maintainability for other developers or future modifications. **Component structure is well-organized and functional.**
The use of `use_signal` for managing the state of `display_form` and its propagation to `CreateButton` and `BottomPanel` is effective for reactive UI updates. The structure using `rsx!` macro is clean and well-organized, promoting readability and maintainability.
Consider adding comments to describe the purpose of each component within the layout, especially for complex nested structures, to enhance readability and maintainability for other developers or future modifications.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
BottomPanel {
|
||||
creating_task: creating_task(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
@ -2,3 +2,13 @@ pub(crate) mod app;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod home;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod project_form;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod task_form;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod task_list;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod pages;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod navigation;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod create_task_button;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod bottom_panel;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod sticky_bottom;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod category_input;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod reoccurrence_input;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod layout;
|
||||
mod navigation_item;
|
||||
|
83
src/components/navigation.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
|
||||
use crate::components::navigation_item::NavigationItem;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn Navigation(expanded: Signal<bool>) -> Element {
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "grid grid-cols-5 justify-stretch",
|
||||
button {
|
||||
class: format!(
|
||||
"py-4 text-center text-2xl {}",
|
||||
if expanded() { "text-zinc-200" }
|
||||
else { "text-zinc-500" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
onclick: move |_| expanded.set(!expanded()),
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-bars"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
NavigationItem {
|
||||
route: Route::CategoryNextStepsPage,
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-forward"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
NavigationItem {
|
||||
route: Route::CategoryCalendarPage,
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-calendar-days"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
NavigationItem {
|
||||
route: Route::CategoryTodayPage,
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-calendar-day"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
NavigationItem {
|
||||
route: Route::CategoryInboxPage,
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-inbox"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{if expanded() {
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
NavigationItem {
|
||||
route: Route::ProjectsPage,
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-list"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
NavigationItem {
|
||||
route: Route::CategoryTrashPage,
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-trash-can"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
NavigationItem {
|
||||
route: Route::CategoryDonePage,
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-check"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
NavigationItem {
|
||||
route: Route::CategoryLongTermPage,
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-water"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
NavigationItem {
|
||||
route: Route::CategoryWaitingForPage,
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-hourglass-half"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else { None }}
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Well-structured Navigation Component The Suggestions:
**Well-structured Navigation Component**
The `Navigation` component is well-structured and makes efficient use of Dioxus features like `rsx!` for JSX-like syntax and conditional rendering based on the `expanded` state. The use of dynamic class names and conditional rendering of `NavigationItem` components based on the `expanded` state are both efficient and maintainable practices.
**Suggestions:**
- **Add comments:** Consider adding comments describing the purpose of each `NavigationItem` and the conditions under which they are rendered. This will enhance maintainability and readability for other developers or future refactoring.
- **Verify integration:** Ensure that the `Route` enum and the routes used in `NavigationItem` components are correctly integrated with the rest of the application's routing structure.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
21
src/components/navigation_item.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
pub(crate) fn NavigationItem(route: Route, children: Element) -> Element {
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
let current_route = use_route::<Route>();
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
Link {
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
to: route.clone(),
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
class: format!(
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
"py-4 text-center text-2xl {}",
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
if current_route == route { "text-zinc-200" }
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
else { "text-zinc-500" }
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
),
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
children
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Component implementation review: The
However, consider adding comments to explain the logic behind the conditional styling for future maintainability. **Component implementation review: `NavigationItem`.**
The `NavigationItem` component is implemented correctly with appropriate use of Dioxus features:
- The `#[component]` attribute correctly marks the function as a Dioxus component.
- The use of `use_route` to fetch the current route and conditionally apply styles is a good practice in reactive UI frameworks.
- The `rsx!` macro is used effectively to define the component's JSX-like structure.
- The conditional class assignment within the `Link` component is both succinct and clear.
However, consider adding comments to explain the logic behind the conditional styling for future maintainability.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of imports and module usage. The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient. **Review of imports and module usage.**
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
- `dioxus::prelude::*` for Dioxus core functionalities.
- `crate::components::task_list::TaskList` seems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.
- `crate::models::category::Category` and `crate::route::Route` are essential for handling routing and category data.
Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
31
src/components/pages/category_calendar_page.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
use crate::components::bottom_panel::BottomPanel;
|
||||
use crate::components::navigation::Navigation;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
use chrono::NaiveDate;
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use crate::components::create_task_button::CreateTaskButton;
|
||||
use crate::components::sticky_bottom::StickyBottom;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_form::TaskForm;
|
||||
use crate::server::tasks::get_tasks_in_category;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn CategoryCalendarPage() -> Element {
|
||||
let tasks = use_server_future(
|
||||
move || get_tasks_in_category(Category::Calendar {
|
||||
date: NaiveDate::default(),
|
||||
reoccurrence: None,
|
||||
time: None,
|
||||
})
|
||||
)?.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
TaskList {
|
||||
tasks: tasks,
|
||||
class: "pb-36"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
27
src/components/pages/category_done_page.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
use crate::components::bottom_panel::BottomPanel;
|
||||
use crate::components::navigation::Navigation;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
use chrono::NaiveDate;
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use crate::components::create_task_button::CreateTaskButton;
|
||||
use crate::components::sticky_bottom::StickyBottom;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_form::TaskForm;
|
||||
use crate::server::tasks::get_tasks_in_category;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn CategoryDonePage() -> Element {
|
||||
let tasks = use_server_future(
|
||||
move || get_tasks_in_category(Category::Done)
|
||||
)?.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
TaskList {
|
||||
tasks: tasks,
|
||||
class: "pb-36"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
27
src/components/pages/category_inbox_page.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
use crate::components::bottom_panel::BottomPanel;
|
||||
use crate::components::navigation::Navigation;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
use chrono::NaiveDate;
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use crate::components::create_task_button::CreateTaskButton;
|
||||
use crate::components::sticky_bottom::StickyBottom;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_form::TaskForm;
|
||||
use crate::server::tasks::get_tasks_in_category;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn CategoryInboxPage() -> Element {
|
||||
let tasks = use_server_future(
|
||||
move || get_tasks_in_category(Category::Inbox)
|
||||
)?.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
TaskList {
|
||||
tasks: tasks,
|
||||
class: "pb-36"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
27
src/components/pages/category_long_term_page.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
use crate::components::bottom_panel::BottomPanel;
|
||||
use crate::components::navigation::Navigation;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
use chrono::NaiveDate;
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use crate::components::create_task_button::CreateTaskButton;
|
||||
use crate::components::sticky_bottom::StickyBottom;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_form::TaskForm;
|
||||
use crate::server::tasks::get_tasks_in_category;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn CategoryLongTermPage() -> Element {
|
||||
let tasks = use_server_future(
|
||||
move || get_tasks_in_category(Category::LongTerm)
|
||||
)?.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
TaskList {
|
||||
tasks: tasks,
|
||||
class: "pb-36"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
27
src/components/pages/category_next_steps_page.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
use crate::components::bottom_panel::BottomPanel;
|
||||
use crate::components::navigation::Navigation;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
![]() Consider refining the broad import from Using **Consider refining the broad import from `dioxus::prelude::*`.**
Using `dioxus::prelude::*` imports all items in the prelude, which might not be necessary. Consider importing only the specific items you need to reduce the scope and improve compile times.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use chrono::NaiveDate;
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use crate::components::create_task_button::CreateTaskButton;
|
||||
use crate::components::sticky_bottom::StickyBottom;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_form::TaskForm;
|
||||
use crate::server::tasks::get_tasks_in_category;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn CategoryNextStepsPage() -> Element {
|
||||
let tasks = use_server_future(
|
||||
move || get_tasks_in_category(Category::NextSteps)
|
||||
)?.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
TaskList {
|
||||
tasks: tasks,
|
||||
class: "pb-36"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
27
src/components/pages/category_someday_maybe_page.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
use crate::components::bottom_panel::BottomPanel;
|
||||
use crate::components::navigation::Navigation;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
use chrono::NaiveDate;
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use crate::components::create_task_button::CreateTaskButton;
|
||||
use crate::components::sticky_bottom::StickyBottom;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_form::TaskForm;
|
||||
use crate::server::tasks::get_tasks_in_category;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn CategorySomedayMaybePage() -> Element {
|
||||
let tasks = use_server_future(
|
||||
move || get_tasks_in_category(Category::SomedayMaybe)
|
||||
)?.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
TaskList {
|
||||
tasks: tasks,
|
||||
class: "pb-36"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
39
src/components/pages/category_today_page.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::components::bottom_panel::BottomPanel;
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::components::create_task_button::CreateTaskButton;
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::components::navigation::Navigation;
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::components::sticky_bottom::StickyBottom;
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::components::task_form::TaskForm;
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::models::task::Task;
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::schema::tasks::category;
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::server::tasks::get_tasks_in_category;
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use chrono::{Local, NaiveDate};
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
pub(crate) fn CategoryTodayPage() -> Element {
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
let tasks = use_server_future(
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
move || get_tasks_in_category(Category::Calendar {
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
date: NaiveDate::default(),
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
reoccurrence: None,
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
time: None,
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
})
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
)?.unwrap().unwrap().iter().filter(|task| {
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
if let Category::Calendar { date, .. } = task.category() {
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
*date == Local::now().date_naive()
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
panic!("Unexpected category.");
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}).cloned().collect::<Vec<Task>>();
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
TaskList {
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
tasks: tasks,
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
class: "pb-36"
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of
Suggestions:
**Review of `CategoryTodayPage` component.**
1. **Date Handling:**
- The use of `Local::now().date_naive()` for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.
2. **Query Usage:**
- The component makes good use of the `use_tasks_in_category_query` for fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.
3. **Error Handling:**
- The component handles errors by displaying them, which is crucial for debugging and user feedback. However, the use of `panic!` for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.
4. **UI Responsiveness:**
- The use of conditional rendering based on the query results (`QueryResult::Ok`, `QueryResult::Loading`, `QueryResult::Err`) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.
5. **Task Filtering Logic:**
- The logic to filter tasks based on their category and date within the `Calendar` category is correctly implemented. However, using `panic!` in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.
6. **Localization:**
- The use of `format_localized` for displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.
**Suggestions:**
- Replace `panic!` with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.
- Implement the loading indicators as mentioned in the TODO comments to enhance the user interface.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
27
src/components/pages/category_trash_page.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
use crate::components::bottom_panel::BottomPanel;
|
||||
use crate::components::navigation::Navigation;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
use chrono::NaiveDate;
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use crate::components::create_task_button::CreateTaskButton;
|
||||
use crate::components::sticky_bottom::StickyBottom;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_form::TaskForm;
|
||||
use crate::server::tasks::get_tasks_in_category;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn CategoryTrashPage() -> Element {
|
||||
let tasks = use_server_future(
|
||||
move || get_tasks_in_category(Category::Trash)
|
||||
)?.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
TaskList {
|
||||
tasks: tasks,
|
||||
class: "pb-36"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
27
src/components/pages/category_waiting_for_page.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
use crate::components::bottom_panel::BottomPanel;
|
||||
use crate::components::navigation::Navigation;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
use chrono::NaiveDate;
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use crate::components::create_task_button::CreateTaskButton;
|
||||
use crate::components::sticky_bottom::StickyBottom;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_form::TaskForm;
|
||||
use crate::server::tasks::get_tasks_in_category;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn CategoryWaitingForPage() -> Element {
|
||||
let tasks = use_server_future(
|
||||
move || get_tasks_in_category(Category::WaitingFor(String::new()))
|
||||
)?.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
TaskList {
|
||||
tasks: tasks,
|
||||
class: "pb-36"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
11
src/components/pages/mod.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
pub(crate) mod category_inbox_page;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod category_calendar_page;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod category_today_page;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod category_waiting_for_page;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod category_long_term_page;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod category_next_steps_page;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod category_someday_maybe_page;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod category_done_page;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod category_trash_page;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod not_found_page;
|
||||
pub(crate) mod projects_page;
|
11
src/components/pages/not_found_page.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
![]() Consider removing unused imports. The imports **Consider removing unused imports.**
The imports `TaskList`, `Category`, and `Route` are not used in the current implementation of `NotFoundPage`. If these are not intended for immediate future use, consider removing them to clean up the code.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Consider removing unused imports. The imports **Consider removing unused imports.**
The imports `TaskList`, `Category`, and `Route` are not used in the current implementation of `NotFoundPage`. If these are not intended for immediate future use, consider removing them to clean up the code.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
![]() Consider removing unused imports. The imports **Consider removing unused imports.**
The imports `TaskList`, `Category`, and `Route` are not used in the current implementation of `NotFoundPage`. If these are not intended for immediate future use, consider removing them to clean up the code.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
![]() Consider removing unused imports. The imports **Consider removing unused imports.**
The imports `TaskList`, `Category`, and `Route` are not used in the current implementation of `NotFoundPage`. If these are not intended for immediate future use, consider removing them to clean up the code.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
![]() Consider removing unused imports. The imports **Consider removing unused imports.**
The imports `TaskList`, `Category`, and `Route` are not used in the current implementation of `NotFoundPage`. If these are not intended for immediate future use, consider removing them to clean up the code.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
![]() Consider removing unused imports. The imports **Consider removing unused imports.**
The imports `TaskList`, `Category`, and `Route` are not used in the current implementation of `NotFoundPage`. If these are not intended for immediate future use, consider removing them to clean up the code.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Consider removing unused imports. The imports **Consider removing unused imports.**
The imports `TaskList`, `Category`, and `Route` are not used in the current implementation of `NotFoundPage`. If these are not intended for immediate future use, consider removing them to clean up the code.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
![]() Consider removing unused imports. The imports **Consider removing unused imports.**
The imports `TaskList`, `Category`, and `Route` are not used in the current implementation of `NotFoundPage`. If these are not intended for immediate future use, consider removing them to clean up the code.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
pub(crate) fn NotFoundPage(route: Vec<String>) -> Element {
|
||||
![]() Consider removing unused imports. The imports **Consider removing unused imports.**
The imports `TaskList`, `Category`, and `Route` are not used in the current implementation of `NotFoundPage`. If these are not intended for immediate future use, consider removing them to clean up the code.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
![]() Consider removing unused imports. The imports **Consider removing unused imports.**
The imports `TaskList`, `Category`, and `Route` are not used in the current implementation of `NotFoundPage`. If these are not intended for immediate future use, consider removing them to clean up the code.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
![]() Enhance the NotFoundPage component. The Additionally, the **Enhance the NotFoundPage component.**
The `NotFoundPage` component currently displays only "404". Consider adding more user-friendly information, such as a message explaining the error and links to navigate back to the home page or other sections of the application.
Additionally, the `route` parameter is not used in the component. If there's no plan to use it for dynamic content based on the route, consider removing it to simplify the component signature.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
{"404"}
|
||||
![]() Consider removing unused imports. The imports **Consider removing unused imports.**
The imports `TaskList`, `Category`, and `Route` are not used in the current implementation of `NotFoundPage`. If these are not intended for immediate future use, consider removing them to clean up the code.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Consider removing unused imports. The imports **Consider removing unused imports.**
The imports `TaskList`, `Category`, and `Route` are not used in the current implementation of `NotFoundPage`. If these are not intended for immediate future use, consider removing them to clean up the code.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Consider removing unused imports. The imports **Consider removing unused imports.**
The imports `TaskList`, `Category`, and `Route` are not used in the current implementation of `NotFoundPage`. If these are not intended for immediate future use, consider removing them to clean up the code.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
7
src/components/pages/projects_page.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn ProjectsPage() -> Element {
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
79
src/components/reoccurrence_input.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
|
||||
use crate::models::category::{Category, Reoccurrence, ReoccurrenceInterval};
|
||||
use crate::server::tasks::get_tasks_in_category;
|
||||
use chrono::NaiveDate;
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use std::fmt::format;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn ReoccurrenceIntervalInput(
|
||||
reoccurrence_interval: Signal<Option<ReoccurrenceInterval>>,
|
||||
class_buttons: Option<&'static str>
|
||||
) -> Element {
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
button {
|
||||
r#type: "button",
|
||||
class: format!(
|
||||
"py-2 rounded-lg {} {}",
|
||||
class_buttons.unwrap_or(""),
|
||||
if reoccurrence_interval().is_none() { "bg-zinc-500/50" }
|
||||
else { "bg-zinc-800/50" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
onclick: move |_| {
|
||||
reoccurrence_interval.set(None);
|
||||
},
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-ban"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
button {
|
||||
r#type: "button",
|
||||
class: format!(
|
||||
"py-2 rounded-lg {} {}",
|
||||
class_buttons.unwrap_or(""),
|
||||
if let Some(ReoccurrenceInterval::Day) = reoccurrence_interval()
|
||||
{ "bg-zinc-500/50" }
|
||||
else { "bg-zinc-800/50" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
onclick: move |_| {
|
||||
reoccurrence_interval.set(Some(ReoccurrenceInterval::Day))
|
||||
},
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-sun"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
button {
|
||||
r#type: "button",
|
||||
class: format!(
|
||||
"py-2 rounded-lg {} {}",
|
||||
class_buttons.unwrap_or(""),
|
||||
if let Some(ReoccurrenceInterval::Month) = reoccurrence_interval()
|
||||
{ "bg-zinc-500/50" }
|
||||
else { "bg-zinc-800/50" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
onclick: move |_| {
|
||||
reoccurrence_interval.set(Some(ReoccurrenceInterval::Month))
|
||||
},
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-moon"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
button {
|
||||
r#type: "button",
|
||||
class: format!(
|
||||
"py-2 rounded-lg {} {}",
|
||||
class_buttons.unwrap_or(""),
|
||||
if let Some(ReoccurrenceInterval::Year) = reoccurrence_interval()
|
||||
{ "bg-zinc-500/50" }
|
||||
else { "bg-zinc-800/50" }
|
||||
),
|
||||
onclick: move |_| {
|
||||
reoccurrence_interval.set(Some(ReoccurrenceInterval::Year))
|
||||
},
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-earth-europe"
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Review of
Consider these improvements:
**Review of `ReoccurrenceIntervalInput` Component**
1. **Use of `unwrap_or` for Default Class Names:**
The use of `unwrap_or` in lines 19, 34, 50, and 66 is appropriate for providing default class names. However, consider defining a constant for the default class name to avoid magic strings and improve maintainability.
2. **Optimization of Repeated `format!` Calls:**
The repeated calls to `format!` in lines 18, 32, 48, and 64 for dynamic class names are necessary but could be optimized. Consider creating a helper function to construct these class names to reduce code duplication and improve readability.
3. **General Structure and Logic:**
The component is well-structured with clear separation of UI elements. The use of conditional rendering based on the `reoccurrence_interval` signal is effective. However, ensure that the `Signal` is properly managed across the component lifecycle to avoid any potential memory leaks or performance issues.
Consider these improvements:
- Define a constant for the default class name.
- Implement a helper function for class name construction.
- Review the lifecycle management of `Signal` to ensure optimal performance.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
14
src/components/sticky_bottom.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use crate::components::task_list::TaskList;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn StickyBottom(children: Element) -> Element {
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "fixed bottom-0 left-0 right-0 flex flex-col",
|
||||
{children}
|
||||
![]() Component definition is well-implemented. The Suggestion for Enhancement: **Component definition is well-implemented.**
The `StickyBottom` component is correctly defined and uses the `rsx!` macro effectively to render its children within a styled div. The use of `pub(crate)` for encapsulation is commendable.
**Suggestion for Enhancement:**
Consider adding `aria-role="contentinfo"` to the div for better accessibility, as it seems to serve a specific layout purpose.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
@ -1,45 +1,65 @@
|
||||
use chrono::Duration;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::{CalendarTime, Category};
|
||||
use std::fmt::Display;
|
||||
use crate::components::category_input::CategoryInput;
|
||||
use crate::components::reoccurrence_input::ReoccurrenceIntervalInput;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::{CalendarTime, Category, Reoccurrence, ReoccurrenceInterval};
|
||||
use crate::models::task::NewTask;
|
||||
use crate::server::projects::get_projects;
|
||||
use crate::server::tasks::create_task;
|
||||
use chrono::{Duration, NaiveDate};
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::{component, rsx};
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use crate::route::Route;
|
||||
|
||||
const REMINDER_OFFSETS: [Option<Duration>; 17] = [
|
||||
None,
|
||||
Some(Duration::days(1)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::hours(12)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::hours(11)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::hours(10)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::hours(9)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::hours(8)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::hours(7)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::hours(6)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::hours(5)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::hours(4)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::hours(3)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::hours(2)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::hours(1)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::minutes(30)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::minutes(10)),
|
||||
Some(Duration::zero()),
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn TaskForm() -> Element {
|
||||
let categories = vec![
|
||||
Category::Inbox,
|
||||
Category::SomedayMaybe,
|
||||
Category::WaitingFor(String::new()),
|
||||
Category::NextSteps,
|
||||
Category::Calendar {
|
||||
date: chrono::Local::now().date_naive(),
|
||||
reoccurance_interval: None,
|
||||
time: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
Category::LongTerm,
|
||||
];
|
||||
let projects = use_server_future(get_projects)?.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let mut selected_category_index = use_signal::<usize>(|| 0);
|
||||
let mut category_calendar_is_reoccurring = use_signal::<bool>(|| false);
|
||||
let mut category_calendar_has_time = use_signal::<bool>(|| false);
|
||||
let mut category_calendar_has_reminder = use_signal::<bool>(|| false);
|
||||
let route = use_route::<Route>();
|
||||
let mut selected_category = use_signal(|| match route {
|
||||
Route::CategorySomedayMaybePage => Category::SomedayMaybe,
|
||||
Route::CategoryWaitingForPage => Category::WaitingFor(String::new()),
|
||||
Route::CategoryNextStepsPage => Category::NextSteps,
|
||||
Route::CategoryCalendarPage | Route::CategoryTodayPage => Category::Calendar {
|
||||
date: NaiveDate::default(),
|
||||
reoccurrence: None,
|
||||
time: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
Route::CategoryLongTermPage => Category::LongTerm,
|
||||
_ => Category::Inbox,
|
||||
});
|
||||
let mut category_calendar_reoccurrence_interval = use_signal(|| None);
|
||||
![]() Refactor suggestion: Improve function signature clarity. The function **Refactor suggestion: Improve function signature clarity.**
The function `TaskForm` now requires an `on_successful_submit` event handler. This is a significant change as it alters how the component interacts with its environment by allowing it to react to successful form submissions. However, the type `EventHandler<()>` could be more descriptive. Consider using a more specific type that indicates what kind of events or data the handler deals with, enhancing code readability and maintainability.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
let mut category_calendar_has_time = use_signal(|| false);
|
||||
let mut category_calendar_reminder_offset_index = use_signal(|| REMINDER_OFFSETS.len() - 1);
|
||||
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
form {
|
||||
onsubmit: move |event| {
|
||||
let categories = categories.clone();
|
||||
async move {
|
||||
let new_task = NewTask::new(
|
||||
event.values().get("title").unwrap().as_value(),
|
||||
event.values().get("deadline").unwrap().as_value().parse().ok(),
|
||||
match &categories[
|
||||
event.values().get("category_index").unwrap()
|
||||
.as_value().parse::<usize>().unwrap()
|
||||
] {
|
||||
match &selected_category() {
|
||||
Category::WaitingFor(_) => Category::WaitingFor(
|
||||
event.values().get("category_waiting_for").unwrap()
|
||||
.as_value()
|
||||
@ -47,24 +67,24 @@ pub(crate) fn TaskForm() -> Element {
|
||||
Category::Calendar { .. } => Category::Calendar {
|
||||
date: event.values().get("category_calendar_date").unwrap()
|
||||
.as_value().parse().unwrap(),
|
||||
reoccurance_interval:
|
||||
event.values().get("category_calendar_is_reoccurring").map(
|
||||
|_| Duration::days(
|
||||
event.values().get("category_calendar_reoccurance_interval")
|
||||
reoccurrence: category_calendar_reoccurrence_interval().map(
|
||||
![]()
Incomplete Route Handling in Dynamic Category Selection Logic The dynamic category selection logic in
Consider adding handling for these routes to ensure that the component can adapt to all possible contexts effectively. Analysis chainVerify dynamic category selection logic. The logic for dynamically determining the selected category based on the current route is a crucial part of the component's functionality. This approach allows the component to adapt to different contexts effectively. However, it's important to ensure that all possible routes are covered and correctly mapped to their respective categories. Consider adding unit tests to verify that the category is set correctly for each route. Would you like me to help by writing these unit tests? Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script:
Length of output: 1587 Script:
Length of output: 1027 > [!TIP]
> Codebase Verification
**Incomplete Route Handling in Dynamic Category Selection Logic**
The dynamic category selection logic in `src/components/task_form.rs` does not cover all possible routes defined in the `Route` enum. Specifically, the following routes are missing from the logic:
- `CategoryInboxPage`
- `CategoryDonePage`
- `CategoryTrashPage`
Consider adding handling for these routes to ensure that the component can adapt to all possible contexts effectively.
<details>
<summary>Analysis chain</summary>
**Verify dynamic category selection logic.**
The logic for dynamically determining the selected category based on the current route is a crucial part of the component's functionality. This approach allows the component to adapt to different contexts effectively. However, it's important to ensure that all possible routes are covered and correctly mapped to their respective categories. Consider adding unit tests to verify that the category is set correctly for each route.
Would you like me to help by writing these unit tests?
</details>
<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all routes are covered and correctly mapped to their respective categories.
# Test: Search for the use of `Route` enum in the project to ensure all routes are handled.
rg --type rust 'Route::'
```
Length of output: 1587
---
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition of the `Route` enum to list all possible routes.
rg --type rust 'enum Route' -A 20
```
Length of output: 1027
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
|reoccurrence_interval| Reoccurrence::new(
|
||||
event.values().get("category_calendar_date").unwrap()
|
||||
.as_value().parse().unwrap(),
|
||||
reoccurrence_interval,
|
||||
event.values().get("category_calendar_reoccurrence_length")
|
||||
.unwrap().as_value().parse().unwrap()
|
||||
)
|
||||
),
|
||||
time: event.values().get("category_calendar_time").unwrap()
|
||||
.as_value().parse().ok().map(|time|
|
||||
.as_value().parse().ok().map(|time|
|
||||
CalendarTime::new(
|
||||
time,
|
||||
event.values().get("category_calendar_has_reminder").map(
|
||||
|_| Duration::minutes(
|
||||
event.values()
|
||||
.get("category_calendar_reminder_offset").unwrap()
|
||||
.as_value().parse().unwrap()
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
REMINDER_OFFSETS[
|
||||
event.values()
|
||||
.get("category_calendar_reminder_offset_index").unwrap()
|
||||
.as_value().parse::<usize>().unwrap()
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
},
|
||||
@ -77,145 +97,207 @@ pub(crate) fn TaskForm() -> Element {
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
class: "p-4 flex flex-col gap-4",
|
||||
input {
|
||||
r#type: "text",
|
||||
name: "title",
|
||||
required: true,
|
||||
placeholder: "title",
|
||||
class: "p-2 bg-neutral-700 rounded",
|
||||
},
|
||||
select {
|
||||
name: "category_index",
|
||||
oninput: move |event| {
|
||||
selected_category_index.set(event.value().parse().unwrap());
|
||||
},
|
||||
class: "p-2 bg-neutral-700 rounded",
|
||||
option {
|
||||
value: 0,
|
||||
"inbox"
|
||||
},
|
||||
option {
|
||||
value: 1,
|
||||
"someday maybe"
|
||||
},
|
||||
option {
|
||||
value: 2,
|
||||
"waiting for"
|
||||
},
|
||||
option {
|
||||
value: 3,
|
||||
"next steps"
|
||||
},
|
||||
option {
|
||||
value: 4,
|
||||
"calendar"
|
||||
},
|
||||
option {
|
||||
value: 5,
|
||||
"long term"
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
match categories[selected_category_index()] {
|
||||
Category::WaitingFor(_) => rsx !{
|
||||
input {
|
||||
r#type: "text",
|
||||
name: "category_waiting_for",
|
||||
required: true,
|
||||
class: "p-2 bg-neutral-700 rounded",
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "flex flex-row items-center gap-3",
|
||||
label {
|
||||
r#for: "input_title",
|
||||
class: "min-w-6 text-center",
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-pen-clip text-zinc-400/50"
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Category::Calendar { .. } => rsx !{
|
||||
input {
|
||||
r#type: "date",
|
||||
name: "category_calendar_date",
|
||||
required: true,
|
||||
class: "p-2 bg-neutral-700 rounded",
|
||||
input {
|
||||
r#type: "text",
|
||||
name: "title",
|
||||
required: true,
|
||||
class: "py-2 px-3 grow bg-zinc-800/50 rounded-lg",
|
||||
id: "input_title"
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "flex flex-row items-center gap-3",
|
||||
label {
|
||||
r#for: "input_project",
|
||||
class: "min-w-6 text-center",
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-list text-zinc-400/50"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
select {
|
||||
![]() Issue: Potential error in date parsing and handling. The handling of the Consider using
**Issue: Potential error in date parsing and handling.**
The handling of the `Category::Calendar` involves multiple date and time parsing operations. There is a potential risk of runtime errors if the parsing fails and the `unwrap()` calls are used without proper error handling. This could lead to panics in a production environment.
Consider using `?` or handling the error explicitly to avoid application crashes due to invalid input data.
```diff
- date: event.values().get("category_calendar_date").unwrap()
- .as_value().parse().unwrap(),
+ date: event.values().get("category_calendar_date").unwrap()
+ .as_value().parse()?,
```
> Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
name: "project_id",
|
||||
class: "px-3.5 py-2.5 bg-zinc-800/50 rounded-lg grow",
|
||||
id: "input_project",
|
||||
option {
|
||||
value: 0,
|
||||
"None"
|
||||
},
|
||||
for project in projects {
|
||||
option {
|
||||
value: project.id().to_string(),
|
||||
{project.title()}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "flex flex-row items-center gap-3",
|
||||
label {
|
||||
r#for: "input_deadline",
|
||||
class: "min-w-6 text-center",
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-bomb text-zinc-400/50"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
input {
|
||||
r#type: "date",
|
||||
name: "deadline",
|
||||
class: "py-2 px-3 bg-zinc-800/50 rounded-lg grow basis-0",
|
||||
id: "input_deadline"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "flex flex-row items-center gap-3",
|
||||
label {
|
||||
class: "min-w-6 text-center",
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-layer-group text-zinc-400/50"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
CategoryInput {
|
||||
selected_category: selected_category.clone(),
|
||||
class: "grow"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
match selected_category() {
|
||||
Category::WaitingFor(_) => rsx! {
|
||||
div {
|
||||
input {
|
||||
r#type: "checkbox",
|
||||
name: "category_calendar_is_reoccurring",
|
||||
id: "category_calendar_is_reoccurring",
|
||||
onchange: move |event| {
|
||||
category_calendar_is_reoccurring.set(event.checked());
|
||||
class: "flex flex-row items-center gap-3",
|
||||
label {
|
||||
r#for: "input_deadline",
|
||||
class: "min-w-6 text-center",
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-hourglass-end text-zinc-400/50"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
label {
|
||||
r#for: "category_calendar_is_reoccurring",
|
||||
" is reoccurring"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
if category_calendar_is_reoccurring() {
|
||||
input {
|
||||
r#type: "number",
|
||||
name: "category_calendar_reoccurance_interval",
|
||||
r#type: "text",
|
||||
name: "category_waiting_for",
|
||||
required: true,
|
||||
min: 1,
|
||||
placeholder: "reoccurance interval (days)",
|
||||
class: "p-2 bg-neutral-700 rounded",
|
||||
class: "py-2 px-3 bg-zinc-800/50 rounded-lg grow",
|
||||
id: "input_category_waiting_for"
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
Category::Calendar { .. } => rsx! {
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "flex flex-row items-center gap-3",
|
||||
label {
|
||||
r#for: "input_category_calendar_date",
|
||||
class: "min-w-6 text-center",
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-clock text-zinc-400/50"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "grow flex flex-row gap-2",
|
||||
input {
|
||||
r#type: "date",
|
||||
name: "category_calendar_date",
|
||||
required: true,
|
||||
initial_value: chrono::Local::now().format("%Y-%m-%d").to_string(),
|
||||
class: "py-2 px-3 bg-zinc-800/50 rounded-lg grow",
|
||||
id: "input_category_calendar_date"
|
||||
},
|
||||
input {
|
||||
r#type: "time",
|
||||
name: "category_calendar_time",
|
||||
class: "py-2 px-3 bg-zinc-800/50 rounded-lg grow",
|
||||
id: "input_category_calendar_time",
|
||||
oninput: move |event| {
|
||||
category_calendar_has_time.set(!event.value().is_empty());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
input {
|
||||
r#type: "time",
|
||||
name: "category_calendar_time",
|
||||
class: "p-2 bg-neutral-700 rounded",
|
||||
oninput: move |event| {
|
||||
category_calendar_has_time.set(!event.value().is_empty());
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "flex flex-row items-center gap-3",
|
||||
label {
|
||||
r#for: "category_calendar_reoccurrence_length",
|
||||
class: "min-w-6 text-center",
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-repeat text-zinc-400/50"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "grow grid grid-cols-6 gap-2",
|
||||
ReoccurrenceIntervalInput {
|
||||
reoccurrence_interval: category_calendar_reoccurrence_interval
|
||||
},
|
||||
input {
|
||||
r#type: "number",
|
||||
inputmode: "numeric",
|
||||
name: "category_calendar_reoccurrence_length",
|
||||
disabled: category_calendar_reoccurrence_interval().is_none(),
|
||||
required: true,
|
||||
min: 1,
|
||||
initial_value:
|
||||
if category_calendar_reoccurrence_interval().is_none() { "" }
|
||||
else { "1" },
|
||||
class: "py-2 px-3 bg-zinc-800/50 rounded-lg col-span-2 text-right",
|
||||
id: "category_calendar_reoccurrence_length"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
if category_calendar_has_time() {
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "flex flex-row items-center gap-3",
|
||||
label {
|
||||
r#for: "category_calendar_reminder_offset_index",
|
||||
class: "min-w-6 text-center",
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-bell text-zinc-400/50"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
input {
|
||||
r#type: "checkbox",
|
||||
name: "category_calendar_has_reminder",
|
||||
value: 0,
|
||||
r#type: "range",
|
||||
name: "category_calendar_reminder_offset_index",
|
||||
min: 0,
|
||||
max: REMINDER_OFFSETS.len() as i64 - 1,
|
||||
initial_value: REMINDER_OFFSETS.len() as i64 - 1,
|
||||
class: "grow input-range-reverse",
|
||||
id: "category_calendar_has_reminder",
|
||||
onchange: move |event| {
|
||||
category_calendar_has_reminder.set(event.checked());
|
||||
oninput: move |event| {
|
||||
category_calendar_reminder_offset_index.set(
|
||||
event.value().parse().unwrap()
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
label {
|
||||
r#for: "category_calendar_has_reminder",
|
||||
" set a reminder"
|
||||
r#for: "category_calendar_reminder_offset_index",
|
||||
class: "pr-3 min-w-16 text-right",
|
||||
{REMINDER_OFFSETS[category_calendar_reminder_offset_index()].map(
|
||||
|offset| if offset.num_hours() < 1 {
|
||||
format!("{} min", offset.num_minutes())
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
format!("{} h", offset.num_hours())
|
||||
}
|
||||
).unwrap_or_else(|| "none".to_string())}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if category_calendar_has_reminder() {
|
||||
input {
|
||||
r#type: "number",
|
||||
name: "category_calendar_reminder_offset",
|
||||
required: true,
|
||||
min: 0,
|
||||
placeholder: "reminder offset (minutes)",
|
||||
class: "p-2 bg-neutral-700 rounded",
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => None
|
||||
},
|
||||
input {
|
||||
r#type: "date",
|
||||
name: "deadline",
|
||||
class: "p-2 bg-neutral-700 rounded",
|
||||
},
|
||||
select {
|
||||
name: "project_id",
|
||||
class: "p-2 bg-neutral-700 rounded",
|
||||
option {
|
||||
value: 0,
|
||||
"none"
|
||||
},
|
||||
for project in projects {
|
||||
option {
|
||||
value: project.id().to_string(),
|
||||
{project.title()}
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "flex flex-row justify-end mt-auto",
|
||||
button {
|
||||
r#type: "submit",
|
||||
class: "py-2 px-4 bg-zinc-300/50 rounded-lg",
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-floppy-disk"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
button {
|
||||
r#type: "submit",
|
||||
"create"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
66
src/components/task_list.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
use crate::models::task::Task;
|
||||
use crate::server::tasks::get_tasks_in_category;
|
||||
use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;
|
||||
use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
|
||||
#[component]
|
||||
pub(crate) fn TaskList(tasks: Vec<Task>, class: Option<&'static str>) -> Element {
|
||||
rsx! {
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: format!("pt-3 px-8 flex flex-col {}", class.unwrap_or("")),
|
||||
for task in tasks {
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: format!(
|
||||
"pt-5 {} flex flex-row gap-4",
|
||||
if task.deadline().is_some() {
|
||||
"pb-0.5"
|
||||
} else if let Category::Calendar { time, .. } = task.category() {
|
||||
if time.is_some() {
|
||||
"pb-0.5"
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
"pb-5"
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
"pb-5"
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Refactor complex conditional logic for class assignment. The nested conditional logic for determining the class based on task properties is complex and could impact maintainability. Consider refactoring this logic into a separate function or using a more structured approach to improve readability and reduce complexity. **Refactor complex conditional logic for class assignment.**
The nested conditional logic for determining the class based on task properties is complex and could impact maintainability. Consider refactoring this logic into a separate function or using a more structured approach to improve readability and reduce complexity.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
),
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-regular fa-square text-3xl text-zinc-600",
|
||||
},
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "flex flex-col",
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "mt-1 grow",
|
||||
{task.title()}
|
||||
},
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "flex flex-row gap-3",
|
||||
if let Some(deadline) = task.deadline() {
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "text-sm text-zinc-400",
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-bomb"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{deadline.format(" %m. %d.").to_string()}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if let Category::Calendar { time, .. } = task.category() {
|
||||
if let Some(calendar_time) = time {
|
||||
div {
|
||||
class: "text-sm text-zinc-400",
|
||||
i {
|
||||
class: "fa-solid fa-clock"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{calendar_time.time().format(" %k:%M").to_string()}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
![]() Optimize rendering of task properties. The rendering of task properties, including the use of FontAwesome icons and conditional rendering based on task deadline and category, is implemented correctly. However, consider using helper functions to render repetitive elements like icons and date formats to improve modularity and reusability. **Optimize rendering of task properties.**
The rendering of task properties, including the use of FontAwesome icons and conditional rendering based on task deadline and category, is implemented correctly. However, consider using helper functions to render repetitive elements like icons and date formats to improve modularity and reusability.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
|
||||
use crate::schema::tasks;
|
||||
use chrono::{Duration, NaiveDate, NaiveTime};
|
||||
use diesel::deserialize::FromSql;
|
||||
use diesel::pg::{Pg, PgValue};
|
||||
use diesel::serialize::{Output, ToSql};
|
||||
use diesel::sql_types::Jsonb;
|
||||
use diesel::{AsExpression, FromSqlRow};
|
||||
use diesel::sql_types::{Bool, Jsonb};
|
||||
use diesel::{AsExpression, BoxableExpression, FromSqlRow, PgJsonbExpressionMethods};
|
||||
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
|
||||
use serde_json::json;
|
||||
use serde_with::DurationSeconds;
|
||||
use std::io::Write;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -18,8 +20,7 @@ pub enum Category {
|
||||
NextSteps,
|
||||
Calendar {
|
||||
date: NaiveDate,
|
||||
#[serde_as(as = "Option<DurationSeconds<i64>>")]
|
||||
reoccurance_interval: Option<Duration>,
|
||||
reoccurrence: Option<Reoccurrence>,
|
||||
time: Option<CalendarTime>,
|
||||
},
|
||||
LongTerm,
|
||||
@ -27,17 +28,26 @@ pub enum Category {
|
||||
Trash,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[serde_with::serde_as]
|
||||
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Clone, Debug)]
|
||||
pub struct CalendarTime {
|
||||
time: NaiveTime,
|
||||
#[serde_as(as = "Option<DurationSeconds<i64>>")]
|
||||
reminder_offset: Option<Duration>,
|
||||
impl Category {
|
||||
pub fn eq_sql_predicate(&self) -> Box<dyn BoxableExpression<tasks::table, Pg, SqlType=Bool>> {
|
||||
use crate::schema::tasks::dsl::*;
|
||||
|
||||
match self {
|
||||
Category::Inbox => Box::new(category.contains(json!("Inbox"))),
|
||||
Category::SomedayMaybe => Box::new(category.contains(json!("SomedayMaybe"))),
|
||||
Category::WaitingFor(_) => Box::new(category.has_key("WaitingFor")),
|
||||
Category::NextSteps => Box::new(category.contains(json!("NextSteps"))),
|
||||
Category::Calendar { .. } => Box::new(category.has_key("Calendar")),
|
||||
Category::LongTerm => Box::new(category.contains(json!("LongTerm"))),
|
||||
Category::Done => Box::new(category.contains(json!("Done"))),
|
||||
Category::Trash => Box::new(category.contains(json!("Trash"))),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl CalendarTime {
|
||||
pub fn new(time: NaiveTime, reminder_offset: Option<Duration>) -> Self {
|
||||
Self { time, reminder_offset }
|
||||
impl PartialEq for Category {
|
||||
fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
|
||||
std::mem::discriminant(self) == std::mem::discriminant(other)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -63,3 +73,53 @@ impl FromSql<Jsonb, Pg> for Category {
|
||||
serde_json::from_str(str).map_err(Into::into)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Clone, Debug)]
|
||||
pub enum ReoccurrenceInterval {
|
||||
![]() Implementation of The use of **Implementation of `Hash` trait for `Category`.**
The use of `std::mem::discriminant` to hash the `Category` enum ensures that the hash value is based only on the enum variant, not its data. This approach is suitable for scenarios where only the type of category matters, not the specific details. However, if specific data within variants needs to influence the hash, this implementation might need to be revisited.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
Day,
|
||||
Month,
|
||||
Year,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Clone, Debug)]
|
||||
pub struct Reoccurrence {
|
||||
![]() Implementation of Similar to the **Implementation of `PartialEq` for `Category`.**
Similar to the `Hash` implementation, using `std::mem::discriminant` for equality checks ensures that comparisons are based solely on the enum variant. This is efficient but consider whether scenarios might require comparing the actual data within the variants, especially for the new `Calendar` variant which includes complex structures like `Reoccurrence`.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
||||
start_date: NaiveDate,
|
||||
interval: ReoccurrenceInterval,
|
||||
length: u32,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Reoccurrence {
|
||||
pub fn new(start_date: NaiveDate, interval: ReoccurrenceInterval, length: u32) -> Self {
|
||||
Self { start_date, interval, length }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn interval(&self) -> &ReoccurrenceInterval {
|
||||
&self.interval
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn length(&self) -> u32 {
|
||||
self.length
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[serde_with::serde_as]
|
||||
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Clone, Debug)]
|
||||
pub struct CalendarTime {
|
||||
time: NaiveTime,
|
||||
#[serde_as(as = "Option<DurationSeconds<i64>>")]
|
||||
reminder_offset: Option<Duration>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl CalendarTime {
|
||||
pub fn new(time: NaiveTime, reminder_offset: Option<Duration>) -> Self {
|
||||
Self { time, reminder_offset }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn time(&self) -> NaiveTime {
|
||||
self.time
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn reminder_offset(&self) -> Option<Duration> {
|
||||
self.reminder_offset
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ use crate::schema::tasks;
|
||||
const TITLE_LENGTH_MIN: u64 = 1;
|
||||
const TITLE_LENGTH_MAX: u64 = 255;
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Queryable, Selectable, Serialize, Deserialize, Clone, Debug)]
|
||||
#[derive(Queryable, Selectable, Serialize, Deserialize, PartialEq, Clone, Debug)]
|
||||
#[diesel(table_name = crate::schema::tasks)]
|
||||
#[diesel(check_for_backend(diesel::pg::Pg))]
|
||||
pub struct Task {
|
||||
|
@ -1,8 +1,48 @@
|
||||
use crate::components::home::Home;
|
||||
use crate::components::pages::category_inbox_page::CategoryInboxPage;
|
||||
use crate::components::pages::category_next_steps_page::CategoryNextStepsPage;
|
||||
use crate::components::pages::category_today_page::CategoryTodayPage;
|
||||
use crate::components::pages::category_trash_page::CategoryTrashPage;
|
||||
use crate::components::pages::category_waiting_for_page::CategoryWaitingForPage;
|
||||
use crate::components::pages::category_someday_maybe_page::CategorySomedayMaybePage;
|
||||
use crate::components::pages::category_done_page::CategoryDonePage;
|
||||
use crate::components::pages::category_calendar_page::CategoryCalendarPage;
|
||||
use crate::components::pages::category_long_term_page::CategoryLongTermPage;
|
||||
use crate::components::pages::projects_page::ProjectsPage;
|
||||
use crate::components::pages::not_found_page::NotFoundPage;
|
||||
use crate::components::layout::Layout;
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Routable, Debug, PartialEq)]
|
||||
#[rustfmt::skip]
|
||||
pub(crate) enum Route {
|
||||
#[route("/")]
|
||||
Home {},
|
||||
#[layout(Layout)]
|
||||
#[redirect("/", || Route::CategoryTodayPage {})]
|
||||
#[route("/today")]
|
||||
CategoryTodayPage,
|
||||
#[route("/inbox")]
|
||||
CategoryInboxPage,
|
||||
#[route("/someday-maybe")]
|
||||
CategorySomedayMaybePage,
|
||||
#[route("/waiting-for")]
|
||||
CategoryWaitingForPage,
|
||||
#[route("/next-steps")]
|
||||
CategoryNextStepsPage,
|
||||
#[route("/calendar")]
|
||||
CategoryCalendarPage,
|
||||
#[route("/long-term")]
|
||||
CategoryLongTermPage,
|
||||
#[route("/done")]
|
||||
CategoryDonePage,
|
||||
#[route("/trash")]
|
||||
CategoryTrashPage,
|
||||
#[route("/projects")]
|
||||
ProjectsPage,
|
||||
#[end_layout]
|
||||
#[redirect("/", || Route::CategoryTodayPage)]
|
||||
#[route("/:..route")]
|
||||
NotFoundPage {
|
||||
route: Vec<String>,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2,10 +2,11 @@ use crate::errors::error::Error;
|
||||
use crate::errors::error_vec::ErrorVec;
|
||||
use crate::models::task::{NewTask, Task};
|
||||
use crate::server::database_connection::establish_database_connection;
|
||||
use diesel::{RunQueryDsl, SelectableHelper};
|
||||
use diesel::{QueryDsl, RunQueryDsl, SelectableHelper};
|
||||
use dioxus::prelude::*;
|
||||
use validator::Validate;
|
||||
use crate::errors::task_create_error::TaskCreateError;
|
||||
use crate::models::category::Category;
|
||||
|
||||
#[server]
|
||||
pub(crate) async fn create_task(new_task: NewTask)
|
||||
@ -43,3 +44,24 @@ pub(crate) async fn create_task(new_task: NewTask)
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(new_task)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[server]
|
||||
pub(crate) async fn get_tasks_in_category(filtered_category: Category)
|
||||
-> Result<Vec<Task>, ServerFnError<ErrorVec<Error>>> {
|
||||
use crate::schema::tasks::dsl::*;
|
||||
|
||||
let mut connection = establish_database_connection()
|
||||
.map_err::<ErrorVec<Error>, _>(
|
||||
|_| vec![Error::ServerInternal].into()
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
|
||||
let results = tasks
|
||||
.select(Task::as_select())
|
||||
.filter(filtered_category.eq_sql_predicate())
|
||||
.load::<Task>(&mut connection)
|
||||
.map_err::<ErrorVec<Error>, _>(
|
||||
|_| vec![Error::ServerInternal].into()
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(results)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Review of the
BottomPanel
component.The
BottomPanel
component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:Reactivity and State Management:
Signal<bool>
fordisplay_form
and the internal state management withexpanded
andnavigation_expanded
are appropriate for reactive UI updates.use_effect
hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on thedisplay_form
. However, the use ofasync_std::task::sleep
for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.UI Responsiveness and Styling:
match
expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.Form Handling and Routing:
current_route
andexpanded
at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.ProjectForm
andTaskForm
withon_successful_submit
callbacks that modify thedisplay_form
state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.Performance Considerations:
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
Review of the
BottomPanel
component.The
BottomPanel
component is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:Reactivity and State Management:
Signal<bool>
fordisplay_form
and the internal state management withexpanded
andnavigation_expanded
are appropriate for reactive UI updates.use_effect
hook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on thedisplay_form
. However, the use ofasync_std::task::sleep
for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.UI Responsiveness and Styling:
match
expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.Form Handling and Routing:
current_route
andexpanded
at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.ProjectForm
andTaskForm
withon_successful_submit
callbacks that modify thedisplay_form
state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.Performance Considerations:
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
Review of the
BottomPanel
ComponentReactivity and State Management:
Signal<bool>
fordisplay_form
and the internal state management withexpanded
andnavigation_expanded
are appropriate for reactive UI updates.use_effect
hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on thedisplay_form
. However, the use ofasync_std::task::sleep
for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.UI Responsiveness and Styling:
match
expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.Form Handling and Routing:
current_route
andexpanded
at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.ProjectForm
andTaskForm
withon_successful_submit
callbacks that modify thedisplay_form
state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.Performance Considerations:
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
Review of the
BottomPanel
ComponentReactivity and State Management:
Signal<bool>
fordisplay_form
and the internal state management withexpanded
andnavigation_expanded
are appropriate for reactive UI updates.use_effect
hook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on thedisplay_form
. However, the use ofasync_std::task::sleep
for a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.UI Responsiveness and Styling:
match
expression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.Form Handling and Routing:
current_route
andexpanded
at lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.ProjectForm
andTaskForm
withon_successful_submit
callbacks that modify thedisplay_form
state is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.Performance Considerations:
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.