feat: ability to view tasks in a category #19
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "feat/tasks-in-category-list"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
BottomPanelfor user interactions.CategoryTodayPagefor displaying tasks by urgency and date.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style
Walkthrough
The changes introduce new components and enhance existing ones within a Rust application using the Dioxus framework. Key modifications include the addition of new dependencies for asynchronous programming and data querying, updates to UI components for improved user interaction, and enhancements to data models for better task and project management. The routing structure has been expanded to support multiple category pages, and new query functionalities have been implemented for tasks and projects.
Changes
Cargo.tomlasync-stdanddioxus-querydependencies; updatedchronofeatures.Dioxus.tomlassets/styles/fonts.css@font-facerules for the "Inter" font family.assets/styles/input_number_arrows.cssassets/styles/input_range.csssrc/components/bottom_panel.rssrc/components/pages/category_today_page.rssrc/route/mod.rsSequence Diagram(s)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Share
Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.Generate unit testing code for this file.Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.@coderabbitai modularize this function.@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai helpto get help.Other keywords and placeholders
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.CodeRabbit Configuration File (
.coderabbit.yaml).coderabbit.yamlfile to the root of your repository.# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.jsonDocumentation and Community
Actionable comments posted: 27
Outside diff range comments (1)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between
9e88c1657banddfefeab69e.Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockFiles selected for processing (42)
Additional comments not posted (73)
Review of the
BottomPanelcomponent.The
BottomPanelcomponent is designed to toggle visibility and switch between forms based on the application's state and routing. Here are some observations and suggestions:Reactivity and State Management:
Signal<bool>fordisplay_formand the internal state management withexpandedandnavigation_expandedare appropriate for reactive UI updates.use_effecthook at lines 13-22 effectively handles the expansion state based on thedisplay_form. However, the use ofasync_std::task::sleepfor a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.UI Responsiveness and Styling:
matchexpression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.Form Handling and Routing:
current_routeandexpandedat lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.ProjectFormandTaskFormwithon_successful_submitcallbacks that modify thedisplay_formstate is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.Performance Considerations:
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
@@ -0,0 +13,4 @@}}}}Well-structured component with effective state management.
The
CreateButtoncomponent is well-implemented with clear use of Dioxus features:Signal<bool>is effectively used for managing the button's state.rsx!macro is correctly used to define the UI elements.However, consider simplifying the button's class attribute for better readability and maintainability:
Then use it in the
rsx!block:@@ -0,0 +21,4 @@}}}}Component structure is well-organized and functional.
The use of
use_signalfor managing the state ofdisplay_formand its propagation toCreateButtonandBottomPanelis effective for reactive UI updates. The structure usingrsx!macro is clean and well-organized, promoting readability and maintainability.Consider adding comments to describe the purpose of each component within the layout, especially for complex nested structures, to enhance readability and maintainability for other developers or future modifications.
@@ -0,0 +78,4 @@} else { None }}}}}Well-structured Navigation Component
The
Navigationcomponent is well-structured and makes efficient use of Dioxus features likersx!for JSX-like syntax and conditional rendering based on theexpandedstate. The use of dynamic class names and conditional rendering ofNavigationItemcomponents based on theexpandedstate are both efficient and maintainable practices.Suggestions:
NavigationItemand the conditions under which they are rendered. This will enhance maintainability and readability for other developers or future refactoring.Routeenum and the routes used inNavigationItemcomponents are correctly integrated with the rest of the application's routing structure.Review of imports and module usage.
The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality:
dioxus::prelude::*for Dioxus core functionalities.crate::components::task_list::TaskListseems unused in this file and could be removed unless it's intended for future use.crate::models::category::Categoryandcrate::route::Routeare essential for handling routing and category data.Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean and efficient.
@@ -0,0 +16,4 @@children}}}Component implementation review:
NavigationItem.The
NavigationItemcomponent is implemented correctly with appropriate use of Dioxus features:#[component]attribute correctly marks the function as a Dioxus component.use_routeto fetch the current route and conditionally apply styles is a good practice in reactive UI frameworks.rsx!macro is used effectively to define the component's JSX-like structure.Linkcomponent is both succinct and clear.However, consider adding comments to explain the logic behind the conditional styling for future maintainability.
@@ -0,0 +2,4 @@use dioxus::core_macro::rsx;use dioxus::dioxus_core::Element;use dioxus::prelude::*;use crate::components::pages::category_page::CategoryPage;Consider refining the broad import from
dioxus::prelude::*.Using
dioxus::prelude::*imports all items in the prelude, which might not be necessary. Consider importing only the specific items you need to reduce the scope and improve compile times.@@ -0,0 +19,4 @@tasks: tasks.clone(),class: "pb-36"}},Consider avoiding unnecessary cloning of tasks.
The tasks are cloned before being passed to the
TaskListcomponent. IfTaskListonly needs a read access, consider passing a reference to avoid the performance cost of cloning.@@ -0,0 +22,4 @@},QueryResult::Loading(None) => rsx! {// TODO: Add a loading indicator.},Implement a loading indicator.
The TODO comment highlights the absence of a loading indicator. Implementing this would improve user experience by providing feedback during data fetching.
Would you like me to help implement this feature or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task?
@@ -0,0 +27,4 @@div {"Errors occurred: {errors:?}"}},Enhance error display for better user understanding.
Consider formatting the error messages or providing additional context to help users understand what went wrong. This could involve a more user-friendly message or troubleshooting steps.
@@ -0,0 +29,4 @@}},value => panic!("Unexpected query result: {value:?}")}Handle unexpected query results more gracefully.
Using
panic!might not be the best approach in a production environment. Consider logging the unexpected result and showing a generic error message or recovery option to the user.@@ -0,0 +30,4 @@},value => panic!("Unexpected query result: {value:?}")}}Component structure and logic are well-implemented.
The
CategoryPagecomponent is structured to handle various states of task fetching effectively:TaskListcomponent.Consider adding a loading indicator in the TODO section to enhance user experience during data fetching.
Review of
CategoryTodayPagecomponent.Date Handling:
Local::now().date_naive()for fetching the current date is appropriate for the context of displaying today's tasks.Query Usage:
use_tasks_in_category_queryfor fetching tasks specific to categories. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.Error Handling:
panic!for unexpected query results is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully.UI Responsiveness:
QueryResult::Ok,QueryResult::Loading,QueryResult::Err) is well implemented. However, the TODO comments about adding a loading indicator should be addressed to improve user experience during data loading.Task Filtering Logic:
Calendarcategory is correctly implemented. However, usingpanic!in the filtering logic (lines 95 and 102) is risky. It's better to handle these cases without crashing the application.Localization:
format_localizedfor displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.Suggestions:
panic!with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.Consider removing unused imports.
The imports
TaskList,Category, andRouteare not used in the current implementation ofNotFoundPage. If these are not intended for immediate future use, consider removing them to clean up the code.@@ -0,0 +5,4 @@rsx! {{"404"}}}Enhance the NotFoundPage component.
The
NotFoundPagecomponent currently displays only "404". Consider adding more user-friendly information, such as a message explaining the error and links to navigate back to the home page or other sections of the application.Additionally, the
routeparameter is not used in the component. If there's no plan to use it for dynamic content based on the route, consider removing it to simplify the component signature.@@ -0,0 +33,4 @@value => panic!("Unexpected query result: {value:?}")}}}Component declaration and logic are well-implemented but need enhancements.
The
ProjectsPagecomponent is well-structured and handles different query results effectively. However, there are a few areas for improvement:panic!in production code can lead to crashes. It's better to handle unexpected cases more gracefully.Consider these enhancements for better robustness and user experience:
Loading Indicator:
Enhanced Error Display:
Graceful Handling of Unexpected Results:
@@ -0,0 +73,4 @@}}}}Review of
ReoccurrenceIntervalInputComponentUse of
unwrap_orfor Default Class Names:The use of
unwrap_orin lines 19, 34, 50, and 66 is appropriate for providing default class names. However, consider defining a constant for the default class name to avoid magic strings and improve maintainability.Optimization of Repeated
format!Calls:The repeated calls to
format!in lines 18, 32, 48, and 64 for dynamic class names are necessary but could be optimized. Consider creating a helper function to construct these class names to reduce code duplication and improve readability.General Structure and Logic:
The component is well-structured with clear separation of UI elements. The use of conditional rendering based on the
reoccurrence_intervalsignal is effective. However, ensure that theSignalis properly managed across the component lifecycle to avoid any potential memory leaks or performance issues.Consider these improvements:
Signalto ensure optimal performance.@@ -0,0 +8,4 @@{children}}}}Component definition is well-implemented.
The
StickyBottomcomponent is correctly defined and uses thersx!macro effectively to render its children within a styled div. The use ofpub(crate)for encapsulation is commendable.Suggestion for Enhancement:
Consider adding
aria-role="contentinfo"to the div for better accessibility, as it seems to serve a specific layout purpose.@@ -30,0 +48,4 @@},Route::CategoryLongTermPage => Category::LongTerm,_ => Category::Inbox,});Refactor suggestion: Improve function signature clarity.
The function
TaskFormnow requires anon_successful_submitevent handler. This is a significant change as it alters how the component interacts with its environment by allowing it to react to successful form submissions. However, the typeEventHandler<()>could be more descriptive. Consider using a more specific type that indicates what kind of events or data the handler deals with, enhancing code readability and maintainability.@@ -47,24 +70,24 @@ pub(crate) fn TaskForm() -> Element {Category::Calendar { .. } => Category::Calendar {Incomplete Route Handling in Dynamic Category Selection Logic
The dynamic category selection logic in
src/components/task_form.rsdoes not cover all possible routes defined in theRouteenum. Specifically, the following routes are missing from the logic:CategoryInboxPageCategoryDonePageCategoryTrashPageConsider adding handling for these routes to ensure that the component can adapt to all possible contexts effectively.
Analysis chain
Verify dynamic category selection logic.
The logic for dynamically determining the selected category based on the current route is a crucial part of the component's functionality. This approach allows the component to adapt to different contexts effectively. However, it's important to ensure that all possible routes are covered and correctly mapped to their respective categories. Consider adding unit tests to verify that the category is set correctly for each route.
Would you like me to help by writing these unit tests?
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 1587
Script:
Length of output: 1027
@@ -133,0 +123,4 @@},},div {class: "flex flex-row items-center gap-3",Issue: Potential error in date parsing and handling.
The handling of the
Category::Calendarinvolves multiple date and time parsing operations. There is a potential risk of runtime errors if the parsing fails and theunwrap()calls are used without proper error handling. This could lead to panics in a production environment.Consider using
?or handling the error explicitly to avoid application crashes due to invalid input data.@@ -0,0 +24,4 @@}} else {"pb-5"}Refactor complex conditional logic for class assignment.
The nested conditional logic for determining the class based on task properties is complex and could impact maintainability. Consider refactoring this logic into a separate function or using a more structured approach to improve readability and reduce complexity.
@@ -0,0 +57,4 @@}}}}Optimize rendering of task properties.
The rendering of task properties, including the use of FontAwesome icons and conditional rendering based on task deadline and category, is implemented correctly. However, consider using helper functions to render repetitive elements like icons and date formats to improve modularity and reusability.
@@ -0,0 +5,4 @@pub(crate) fn use_projects_query() -> UseQuery<QueryValue, QueryErrors, QueryKey> {use_get_query([QueryKey::Projects, QueryKey::Tasks], fetch_projects)}Issue with handling multiple query keys in
fetch_projects.The
fetch_projectsfunction only handlesQueryKey::Projectsand does not account forQueryKey::Tasks. This could lead to unexpected behavior ifQueryKey::Tasksis used. Consider updating the function to handle both query keys appropriately.src/query/projects.rs,fetch_projectsfunction.Analysis chain
Verify the use of multiple query keys.
The function uses multiple query keys (
ProjectsandTasks). Ensure that this combined fetching strategy is intended and correctly implemented across the application.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 1281
Script:
Length of output: 783
@@ -0,0 +17,4 @@} else {panic!("Unexpected query keys: {:?}", keys);}}Improve error handling to avoid application crashes.
The function uses
panic!for handling unexpected conditions, which is not recommended in production environments as it can cause the application to crash. Consider refactoring to handle errors more gracefully.Suggest replacing
panic!with proper error handling:Consider improving error handling in
fetch_tasks_in_category.The use of
panic!for handling unexpected errors (lines 19 and 22) is risky in a production environment as it can cause the application to crash. Consider logging these errors or returning a controlled error response instead.Suggested changes to improve error handling:
And for the unexpected keys:
Actionable comments posted: 6
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between
dfefeab69eand2b39283bf5.Files selected for processing (13)
Additional comments not posted (20)
Review of the
BottomPanelComponentReactivity and State Management:
Signal<bool>fordisplay_formand the internal state management withexpandedandnavigation_expandedare appropriate for reactive UI updates.use_effecthook at lines 14-23 effectively handles the expansion state based on thedisplay_form. However, the use ofasync_std::task::sleepfor a UI effect (delayed collapse) might not be the best approach. Consider using CSS transitions for smoother and more controllable UI effects.UI Responsiveness and Styling:
matchexpression in the class string is a good use of Rust's pattern matching but might be hard to maintain as more conditions or pages are added.Form Handling and Routing:
current_routeandexpandedat lines 36-56 is clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary.ProjectFormandTaskFormwithon_successful_submitcallbacks that modify thedisplay_formstate is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.Performance Considerations:
Overall, the component is well-constructed but could benefit from optimizations and simplifications in handling UI effects and styles.
Implementation of
Hashtrait forCategory.The use of
std::mem::discriminantto hash theCategoryenum ensures that the hash value is based only on the enum variant, not its data. This approach is suitable for scenarios where only the type of category matters, not the specific details. However, if specific data within variants needs to influence the hash, this implementation might need to be revisited.@@ -63,3 +82,53 @@ impl FromSql<Jsonb, Pg> for Category {serde_json::from_str(str).map_err(Into::into)}}Implementation of
PartialEqforCategory.Similar to the
Hashimplementation, usingstd::mem::discriminantfor equality checks ensures that comparisons are based solely on the enum variant. This is efficient but consider whether scenarios might require comparing the actual data within the variants, especially for the newCalendarvariant which includes complex structures likeReoccurrence.Implementation of
Reoccurrencestruct and its methods.The
Reoccurrencestruct is well-implemented with methods to access its fields. This struct will play a crucial role in handling task recurrence. Ensure that the methods likenew,interval, andlengthare covered by unit tests to verify their correctness and handle edge cases.Would you like me to help in writing these unit tests or perhaps open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Enhancements to
CalendarTimestruct.The
CalendarTimestruct now includes areminder_offset, which is a thoughtful addition for setting reminders relative to the task time. This struct's methods (new,time,reminder_offset) are crucial for the correct handling of time-related features. Similar toReoccurrence, ensure these methods are thoroughly tested.Would you like assistance with creating unit tests for these methods?
@@ -0,0 +21,4 @@} else {panic!("Unexpected query keys: {:?}", keys);}}Consider improving error handling in
fetch_tasks_in_category.The use of
panic!for handling unexpected errors (lines 19 and 22) is risky in a production environment as it can cause the application to crash. Consider logging these errors or returning a controlled error response instead.Suggested changes to improve error handling:
And for the unexpected keys:
@@ -0,0 +22,4 @@},QueryResult::Loading(None) => rsx! {// TODO: Add a loading indicator.},Open an issue.
@@ -0,0 +22,4 @@},QueryResult::Loading(None) => rsx! {// TODO: Add a loading indicator.},@matous-volf, the GitHub issue has been successfully created to track the task of implementing a loading indicator in the
CategoryPagecomponent. You can view and manage the issue here: Issue #20.Analysis chain
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 659
Open an issue to track the task of writing unit tests generally, not just for these functions.
@matous-volf, the issue to track the task of writing unit tests across the codebase has been successfully created. You can find it here: https://github.com/matous-volf/todo-baggins/issues/21.
Note: There was a minor issue with the backticks around
Reoccurrencein the script, but it didn't affect the creation of the issue.Analysis chain
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 620
Actionable comments posted: 4
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between
2b39283bf5andfaf6f93f84.Files selected for processing (6)
Additional comments not posted (2)
@@ -0,0 +60,4 @@background: rgba(39 39 42 / 50%);height: 0.5rem;border-radius: 0.25rem;}Styling for Input Range is Well-Implemented
The CSS for the input range elements is well-implemented with attention to cross-browser compatibility and modern design standards. The use of vendor-specific pseudo-elements like
::-webkit-slider-thumband::-moz-range-thumbensures that the styles are applied correctly across different browsers. The use of RGBA for colors and rem units for dimensions enhances the responsiveness and aesthetic of the sliders.Consider adding comments to the CSS to explain the purpose of specific styles, especially for complex selectors or unusual styles, to improve maintainability.
@@ -0,0 +59,4 @@}}}}Review of the
BottomPanelComponentReactivity and State Management:
Signal<bool>fordisplay_formand the internal state management withexpandedandnavigation_expandedare well implemented for reactive UI updates. Theuse_effecthook effectively handles the expansion state based on thedisplay_form.UI Responsiveness and Styling:
Form Handling and Routing:
current_routeandexpandedis clear and aligns with the routing enhancements mentioned in the PR summary. The use ofProjectFormandTaskFormwithon_successful_submitcallbacks that modify thedisplay_formstate is a good pattern for form handling in reactive systems.Performance Considerations:
Suggestions:
Consider these improvements for better performance and maintainability:
@@ -0,0 +157,4 @@}}}}Review of the
CategoryTodayPageComponentQuery Usage and Data Handling:
use_tasks_in_category_queryfor fetching tasks specific to categories is well implemented. This modular approach aids in maintainability and reusability.Error Handling and Robustness:
panic!for unexpected query results (lines 86, 95, 102) is not recommended in production code as it can cause the application to crash. Consider handling these cases more gracefully by logging the error or displaying a user-friendly message instead of crashing the application.UI Responsiveness and Loading Indicators:
Localization and Date Formatting:
format_localizedfor displaying the date is a good practice for supporting multiple locales.Suggestions:
panic!with more robust error handling to prevent application crashes.Replace the use of
panic!with more robust error handling:Implement loading indicators to improve the user experience during data loading.
Comprehensive Review of the
RouteEnumExpanded Routing for Categories:
CategoryTodayPage,CategoryInboxPage, etc.) is a significant enhancement aligning with the PR's objectives. This structured approach facilitates direct navigation to categorized tasks, improving user experience.Layout and Redirection Consistency:
#[layout(Layout)]at line 20 and#[end_layout]at line 42 ensures that all routes are rendered within a specified layout, maintaining a consistent user interface across different pages.#[redirect("/", || Route::CategoryTodayPage {})]attribute at lines 21 and 43 should be addressed. Having this attribute twice could lead to confusion or unintended behavior. It is recommended to keep the redirect at the start of the enum and remove the second occurrence to clean up the routing logic.Dynamic Handling of Unmatched Routes:
NotFoundPagevariant to accept arouteparameter (line 46) is a significant improvement. This allows for dynamic handling of unmatched routes, which can be particularly useful for displaying custom error pages or redirecting users based on the URL path.Suggestions:
Consider removing the redundant redirect to clean up the routing logic:
Committable suggestion