matous-volf/todo-baggins
matous-volf/todo-baggins
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 23 Pull Requests Actions Projects 1 Activity

ci: linter configuration #10

Merged
matous-volf merged 1 commits from ci/linter-configuration into main 2024-08-17 10:30:36 +00:00
Conversation 3 Commits 1 Files Changed 1 +5
matous-volf commented 2024-08-17 10:26:18 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced new environment variables for enhanced control over linting processes: VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_PRETTIER, VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_STANDARD, VALIDATE_RUST_2015, VALIDATE_RUST_2018, and VALIDATE_SQLFLUFF, all defaulting to false.
  • Improvements
    • Enhanced flexibility in the CI/CD pipeline, allowing developers to customize which validation tools are active for better code quality management.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced new environment variables for enhanced control over linting processes: `VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_PRETTIER`, `VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_STANDARD`, `VALIDATE_RUST_2015`, `VALIDATE_RUST_2018`, and `VALIDATE_SQLFLUFF`, all defaulting to `false`. - **Improvements** - Enhanced flexibility in the CI/CD pipeline, allowing developers to customize which validation tools are active for better code quality management. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
coderabbitai[bot] commented 2024-08-17 10:26:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration enhance the flexibility of the linting process by introducing five new environment variables. These variables allow developers to selectively enable or disable validation tools for JavaScript and Rust code, as well as SQL formatting, making the continuous integration process more customizable. This change aims to improve code quality and adherence to standards by providing better control over the linting practices employed in the CI/CD pipeline.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/lint.yml Added five new environment variables (VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_PRETTIER, VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_STANDARD, VALIDATE_RUST_2015, VALIDATE_RUST_2018, VALIDATE_SQLFLUFF), all set to false, allowing for more granular control over linting options.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant CI/CD Pipeline
    participant Linting Tools

    Developer->>CI/CD Pipeline: Commit changes
    CI/CD Pipeline->>Linting Tools: Run linting based on environment variables
    Linting Tools-->>CI/CD Pipeline: Return linting results
    CI/CD Pipeline-->>Developer: Notify build status
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- walkthrough_start --> ## Walkthrough The recent updates to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration enhance the flexibility of the linting process by introducing five new environment variables. These variables allow developers to selectively enable or disable validation tools for JavaScript and Rust code, as well as SQL formatting, making the continuous integration process more customizable. This change aims to improve code quality and adherence to standards by providing better control over the linting practices employed in the CI/CD pipeline. ## Changes | Files | Change Summary | |--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | `.github/workflows/lint.yml` | Added five new environment variables (`VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_PRETTIER`, `VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_STANDARD`, `VALIDATE_RUST_2015`, `VALIDATE_RUST_2018`, `VALIDATE_SQLFLUFF`), all set to `false`, allowing for more granular control over linting options. | ## Sequence Diagram(s) ```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant Developer participant CI/CD Pipeline participant Linting Tools Developer->>CI/CD Pipeline: Commit changes CI/CD Pipeline->>Linting Tools: Run linting based on environment variables Linting Tools-->>CI/CD Pipeline: Return linting results CI/CD Pipeline-->>Developer: Notify build status ``` <!-- walkthrough_end --><!-- This is an auto-generated comment: raw summary by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- .github/workflows/lint.yml: ## AI-generated summary of changes The provided diff introduces several new environment variable declarations within the GitHub Actions workflow configuration file `.github/workflows/lint.yml`. Specifically, five new variables have been added to the job configuration, all set to `false`. These variables are `VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_PRETTIER`, `VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_STANDARD`, `VALIDATE_RUST_2015`, `VALIDATE_RUST_2018`, and `VALIDATE_SQLFLUFF`. The addition of these variables indicates a shift in the workflow's linting capabilities, allowing for more granular control over which validation tools are enabled or disabled during the CI/CD process. The existing variables related to CSS, HTML, and JavaScript linting remain unchanged, but the new variables suggest an intent to either disable or selectively enable validation for JavaScript and Rust code, as well as SQL formatting. This modification enhances the workflow's flexibility by allowing developers to tailor the linting process according to their project's requirements without altering the core functionality of the existing linting setup. Overall, these changes reflect an evolution in the project's CI/CD practices, promoting a more customizable approach to code validation, which could lead to improved code quality and adherence to standards as developers can now easily manage which linters are active during the build process. ## Alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities - `VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_PRETTIER` in `.github/workflows/lint.yml` → `VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_PRETTIER: false` in `.github/workflows/lint.yml` - `VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_STANDARD` in `.github/workflows/lint.yml` → `VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_STANDARD: false` in `.github/workflows/lint.yml` - `VALIDATE_RUST_2015` in `.github/workflows/lint.yml` → `VALIDATE_RUST_2015: false` in `.github/workflows/lint.yml` - `VALIDATE_RUST_2018` in `.github/workflows/lint.yml` → `VALIDATE_RUST_2018: false` in `.github/workflows/lint.yml` - `VALIDATE_SQLFLUFF` in `.github/workflows/lint.yml` → `VALIDATE_SQLFLUFF: false` in `.github/workflows/lint.yml` --> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: raw summary by coderabbit.ai --><!-- This is an auto-generated comment: pr objectives by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- Title: ci: linter configuration Number: 10 User: matous-volf --> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: pr objectives by coderabbit.ai --><!-- commit_ids_reviewed_start --> <!-- 22a7d8bf230d4966f4b308dd519c7fcf3bb774fa --> <!-- commit_ids_reviewed_end --><!-- tips_start --> --- <details> <summary>Tips</summary> ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements. </details> <!-- tips_end -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2024-08-17 10:29:17 +00:00
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment
Copy Link

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8da225e374 and 22a7d8bf23.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (5)

33-33: Verify default setting for VALIDATE_RUST_2018.

Disabling Rust 2018 edition validation by default might affect compatibility checks. Confirm this decision aligns with the project's Rust version support strategy.

30-30: Verify default setting for VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_PRETTIER.

Disabling JavaScript Prettier validation by default could lead to style inconsistencies. Ensure this aligns with the project's coding standards.

32-32: Verify default setting for VALIDATE_RUST_2015.

Disabling Rust 2015 edition validation by default may affect compatibility checks. Ensure this aligns with the project's Rust version support strategy.

34-34: Verify default setting for VALIDATE_SQLFLUFF.

Disabling SQLFluff validation by default could lead to SQL formatting inconsistencies. Ensure this aligns with the project's SQL formatting policies.

31-31: Verify default setting for VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_STANDARD.

Disabling JavaScript StandardJS validation by default might affect code quality. Confirm this decision aligns with the project's linting policies.

**Actionable comments posted: 0** <details> <summary>Review details</summary> **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: ASSERTIVE** <details> <summary>Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8da225e374341c29db0d54de45fae20103150b0e and 22a7d8bf230d4966f4b308dd519c7fcf3bb774fa. </details> <details> <summary>Files selected for processing (1)</summary> * .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>Additional comments not posted (5)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>.github/workflows/lint.yml (5)</summary><blockquote> `33-33`: **Verify default setting for `VALIDATE_RUST_2018`.** Disabling Rust 2018 edition validation by default might affect compatibility checks. Confirm this decision aligns with the project's Rust version support strategy. --- `30-30`: **Verify default setting for `VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_PRETTIER`.** Disabling JavaScript Prettier validation by default could lead to style inconsistencies. Ensure this aligns with the project's coding standards. --- `32-32`: **Verify default setting for `VALIDATE_RUST_2015`.** Disabling Rust 2015 edition validation by default may affect compatibility checks. Ensure this aligns with the project's Rust version support strategy. --- `34-34`: **Verify default setting for `VALIDATE_SQLFLUFF`.** Disabling SQLFluff validation by default could lead to SQL formatting inconsistencies. Ensure this aligns with the project's SQL formatting policies. --- `31-31`: **Verify default setting for `VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_STANDARD`.** Disabling JavaScript StandardJS validation by default might affect code quality. Confirm this decision aligns with the project's linting policies. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
coderabbitai[bot] (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2024-08-17 10:29:21 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
coderabbitai[bot]
Labels
Clear labels
bug
feature
refactor
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: matous-volf/todo-baggins#10
No description provided.
Delete Branch "ci/linter-configuration"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?